10 Best Botpress Alternatives of 2026
By the DBotMaker research desk · Updated November 9, 2026 · Next review December 24, 2026 · 10 products compared
Spec sheet
Vendor-documented specs. Click a column to sort.
| Product | Free plan or trial | Setup | Build style | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dify | 8.4 | $49.17 | Free plan | Web app, API, Self-hosted | Marketplace of tools, models and plugins, plus MCP | Self-serve | Visual workflow canvas, open source, self-hostable |
| 2 | Voiceflow | 8.4 | Check price | No | Web chat, Voice, SMS, API | Integrations, MCP servers and helpdesk handoff to Salesforce, Zendesk, Intercom and others | Both | Visual playbooks and workflows plus JavaScript functions |
| 3 | Microsoft Copilot Studio | 8.1 | $200 | No | Teams, Microsoft 365, Website, Mobile app, WhatsApp, Facebook, Slack, Telegram, Email | 1,500+ pre-built data connectors and MCP servers | Both | Low-code canvas with agentic and traditional automation |
| 4 | Rasa | 8.0 | Free | Free plan | Web chat, Voice, REST, WebSocket | Channel connectors, custom actions server and MCP | Both | Code-first with a no-code flow builder |
| 5 | Typebot | 8.0 | $39 | Free plan | Website, WhatsApp, HTTP API | OpenAI, Google Sheets, Zapier, Make.com, Pabbly Connect, webhooks | Self-serve | Visual block builder, open source |
| 6 | Chatbase | 7.9 | $32 | 7-day trial | Web chat, WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, Slack, Email, Voice | Shopify, Slack, Calendly, WordPress on Hobby; Zendesk, Salesforce, HubSpot, Intercom, Zapier from Basic | Self-serve | No-code agent trained on your content |
| 7 | Google Dialogflow CX | 7.8 | $0.01 | No | Web chat, Phone, Messenger, Slack, Google Chat, LINE | Telephony via Twilio, Avaya, AudioCodes, Voximplant and SIP; webhooks | Self-serve | Visual flow builder plus generative playbooks and webhooks |
| 8 | Landbot | 7.6 | Free plan | Free plan | Website, WhatsApp, Messenger, API | 20+ native integrations, 500+ via Zapier and n8n | Both | Visual no-code builder with AI agents |
| 9 | Amazon Lex | 7.5 | $0.00 | No | Phone, Web chat, Messenger, Slack, Twilio SMS | AWS Lambda, Amazon Connect, Amazon Bedrock | Self-serve | Console builder plus Lambda code |
| 10 | StackAI | 7.4 | Free | Free plan | Slack, Chrome extension, REST API | 500+ enterprise integrations | Sales-led | Visual workflow canvas with Python and JavaScript steps |
The short version
Voiceflow is the closest replacement for Botpress's visual studio, with stronger release tooling and native voice, though it no longer publishes prices. Dify gives the best value: an open-source visual builder you can self-host for free or run on a flat yearly cloud plan. Copilot Studio wins inside Microsoft 365, and Typebot is the most predictable option for guided flows. Rasa is the code-first choice for teams that must own hosting and data, while Dialogflow CX and Amazon Lex suit developers who want per-request billing on Google Cloud or AWS. Chatbase is the fastest way to a trained support agent, Landbot fits marketing teams on websites and WhatsApp, and StackAI fits enterprises building internal document agents.
Short answer
Voiceflow is the best Botpress alternative for support teams building chat and voice agents in 2026; Dify suits builders who want an open-source visual canvas, with cloud plans from $590 per workspace a year. Typebot's free plan covers 200 chats a month, and Rasa's Developer Edition is free for one bot with up to 1,000 external conversations a month.
This list is for bot builders weighing a move off Botpress, whether they want a different visual studio, more control over code and hosting, or a simpler price. For reference, Botpress has a free plan with 100 conversations and its Plus plan costs $150 a month billed annually with 250 conversations included. We compared documented features and published prices for 10 alternatives in three groups: visual agent studios (Voiceflow, Dify, Copilot Studio, StackAI), chat builders for flows and support (Typebot, Chatbase, Landbot) and code-first platforms (Rasa, Dialogflow CX, Amazon Lex). Scores cover capabilities, ease of setup and value, weighted 40, 30 and 30. The spec sheet shows each tool's build style so you can see at a glance how much code it expects. Prices are in US dollars as shown on the vendor page we fetched; where a vendor publishes no price or showed euros, the price is marked as pending.
Figures worth knowing
- $41.39 billionGrand View Research forecasts the global conversational AI market will reach $41.39 billion in 2030, growing at a compound annual rate of 23.7% from 2025.Source: Grand View Research
- $8.5 billionJuniper Research expects agentic conversational AI service revenue to rise from $2.4 billion in 2026 to $8.5 billion in 2030, an increase of more than 250%.Source: Juniper Research
- 50.5%Among Canadian businesses with 100 or more employees that used AI in the 12 months to the second quarter of 2026, 50.5% used it for virtual agents or chat bots.Source: Statistics Canada
- 37%Among U.S. firms with at least 250 employees, 37% reported using AI in their business operations in 2026.Source: U.S. Census Bureau
- 7%Only 7% of customers used a chatbot or digital assistant in their most recent service interaction, even though 49% said they would have been willing to use one, in Gartner's survey of 3,566 customers in early 2026.Source: Gartner
The ranking at a glance
- 1DifyDevelopers and small teams who want a visual builder they can self-host for free or run on a flat cloud plan.8.4
- 2VoiceflowProduct and CX teams that want a Botpress-style visual studio with stronger voice, testing and release controls.8.4
- 3Microsoft Copilot StudioOrganizations on Microsoft 365 and Azure that want agents inside Teams with access to company data and connectors.8.1
- 4RasaEngineering teams in regulated industries that want full control of their assistant's code, data and hosting.8.0
- 5TypebotMarketers and small businesses that want structured chat flows with flat monthly pricing.8.0
- 6ChatbaseSmall businesses that want a trained support agent live in minutes without building flows.7.9
- 7Google Dialogflow CXDevelopers on Google Cloud building high-volume chat or phone agents with pay-per-request billing.7.8
- 8LandbotMarketing and sales teams that want a visual builder for website and WhatsApp lead capture.7.6
- 9Amazon LexDevelopers on AWS who need chat and phone bots tied to Amazon Connect and Lambda.7.5
- 10StackAIEnterprises in regulated industries automating document-heavy work with AI agents.7.4
How we make the call
Every entry gets a 0 to 10 rating on the three criteria below, and the order follows the weighted total. The ratings rest on the documented features and published prices on each maker's own pages, never hands-on testing.
- 40%Capabilities
- 30%Ease of setup
- 30%Value
No. 1, top ranked
DifyAn open-source platform for building agentic workflows, chat apps and RAG pipelines on a visual canvas, hosted or self-deployed.
8.4of 10Best for Developers and small teams who want a visual builder they can self-host for free or run on a flat cloud plan.
- Capabilities
- 8.7
- Ease of setup
- 7.5
- Value
- 8.8
Price
Free Sandbox and Community Edition; Professional $590 per workspace a year with 5,000 message credits a month; Team $1,590 a year
Quoted from the Dify pricing page on November 9, 2026:
$590 per workspace / year
Dify suits Botpress users who want the visual canvas but also want the option to own the stack. The Community Edition is free to self-deploy with Docker, and the same platform runs as Dify Cloud or inside a private VPC. Workflow Studio is the visual builder for agentic workflows, Knowledge Pipeline prepares documents for retrieval, and a marketplace adds tools, models and plugins. Workflows can start from plugins, schedules or webhooks, which makes Dify useful for back-office agents as well as chat. On the cloud, Professional costs $590 per workspace a year with 5,000 message credits a month across OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and other providers, then you can switch to your own API key. Team is $1,590 a year for up to 50 members. The tradeoff is that Dify is a builder for AI apps rather than a messaging platform, so WhatsApp or helpdesk handoff needs plugins or your own code.
What it does well
- +Community Edition is free to self-deploy with Docker
- +Professional includes 3 members, 50 apps and 5,000 message credits a month
- +Switch to your own model API key once credits run out
Where it falls short
- −Best prices on the page are for yearly billing
- −Self-hosting means you run upgrades, storage and security yourself
- −Built-in channel connectors are thinner than chat-first builders
- Plans
- Sandbox free, Professional $590 and Team $1,590 per workspace a year
- Professional limits
- 3 members, 50 apps, 500 knowledge documents, 5GB storage
- Open source
- Community Edition under the Dify Open Source License
- GitHub
- About 161k stars on langgenius/dify
No. 2
VoiceflowA collaborative builder for customer support chat and voice agents, mixing goal-based playbooks with scripted workflows.
8.4of 10Best for Product and CX teams that want a Botpress-style visual studio with stronger voice, testing and release controls.
- Capabilities
- 9.2
- Ease of setup
- 8.4
- Value
- 7.4
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending)
No US price was listed when we checked. See the Voiceflow pricing page.
Voiceflow is the closest match for teams that picked Botpress for its visual studio but now need more structure around releases. Agents combine playbooks, which handle open-ended goals such as rebooking a cancelled order, with workflows for steps that must run the same way every time. A knowledge base keeps answers tied to help center pages and PDFs, and JavaScript functions or API tools call your own systems mid-conversation. The same agent deploys to web chat, phone, SMS or any app through the API. Where it pulls ahead is the production side: separate environments, versioning, change review and traffic splits, plus simulations and LLM-graded evaluations before customers see a change. The weak spot for buyers is pricing. Voiceflow publishes a free trial for agencies and a request-pricing path for businesses, with usage-based billing, so it is harder to budget than Botpress's published plans.
What it does well
- +Chat, voice and SMS agents are built in the same project
- +Release tooling (environments, change review, traffic splits) suits teams shipping often
- +Choice of major LLM providers or your own model avoids lock-in
Where it falls short
- −No public price list; agencies get a free trial and businesses request pricing
- −Billing is usage-based, so costs need a forecast before launch
- −The depth of the platform takes time to learn for a single builder
- Pricing
- Free trial for agencies; businesses request pricing
- Channels
- Chat, voice, SMS and API
- Compliance
- SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA listed
- Models
- Major LLM providers or bring your own model
No. 3
Microsoft Copilot StudioMicrosoft's low-code agent builder for Teams, Microsoft 365, websites and other channels, billed in Copilot Credits.
8.1of 10Best for Organizations on Microsoft 365 and Azure that want agents inside Teams with access to company data and connectors.
- Capabilities
- 8.9
- Ease of setup
- 7.6
- Value
- 7.6
Price
Copilot Credit packs of 25,000 credits at $200 per pack per month, or pay as you go through Azure
Quoted from the Microsoft Copilot Studio pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Copilot Studio is sold as tenant-wide Copilot Credit packs of 25,000 Copilot Credits each, priced at $200.00 /pack/month.
Copilot Studio is the practical choice when the bot needs to live where employees already work. Agents publish to Teams and Microsoft 365, a custom website, a mobile app, WhatsApp and Facebook, and Azure Bot Service adds Slack, Telegram, Twilio, LINE and email. Microsoft lists 1,500+ pre-built data connectors plus MCP servers, so an HR or IT agent can read SharePoint files and update business systems without much custom code. Builders can mix agentic steps with traditional workflow automation in the same agent. Pricing is consumption-based: tenant-wide packs of 25,000 Copilot Credits cost $200 per pack per month, or a pay-as-you-go meter bills only what is used. Each action or response consumes a varying number of credits, so a pilot is the only reliable way to forecast cost. Outside the Microsoft stack, the platform feels heavier than Botpress.
What it does well
- +Deepest fit for Teams and Microsoft 365 users
- +Connector catalog reaches most business systems without custom code
- +Pay-as-you-go option avoids an upfront commitment
Where it falls short
- −Credit consumption varies by action, so costs are harder to predict
- −Credit packs are tenant-wide and start at $200 a month
- −Admin governance policies can block channels until IT approves them
- Credit pack
- 25,000 Copilot Credits for $200 per pack per month
- Connectors
- 1,500+ pre-built data connectors
- Azure credit
- $200 credit with a new free Azure account
- Billing options
- Prepaid packs or pay-as-you-go meter
Visit microsoft.com|Read the full Microsoft Copilot Studio profile
No. 4
RasaA code-first conversational AI platform that combines LLMs with structured flows, deployable on your own Kubernetes or as a managed service.
8.0of 10Best for Engineering teams in regulated industries that want full control of their assistant's code, data and hosting.
- Capabilities
- 8.8
- Ease of setup
- 6.4
- Value
- 8.4
Price
Free Developer Edition for one bot with up to 1,000 external conversations a month; Enterprise by quote
Quoted from the Rasa pricing page on November 9, 2026:
One bot per company, with up to 1000 external conversations/month or 100 internal conversations/month.
Rasa is the code-first answer for teams that find Botpress too much of a managed black box. Its CALM approach keeps business logic in structured flows while an LLM handles understanding and rephrasing, which suits banks, insurers and healthcare teams that need predictable answers. Developers write custom actions in Python with the Rasa SDK, and product staff can use a no-code flow builder in the same project. Deployment is the main difference from Botpress: Rasa runs on your Kubernetes cluster with Helm, Redis and Kafka, or as a managed service, and the platform includes SSO, RBAC, PII handling and Vault secrets. The free Developer Edition can run in production for one bot with up to 1,000 external conversations a month. Enterprise plans with premium support are sold by quote. The cost is engineering time, since you own the infrastructure.
What it does well
- +Free license usable locally or in production for one bot
- +Self-managed on-premises or private cloud deployment
- +Multi-LLM management and open prompt editing
Where it falls short
- −Running Rasa in production needs Kubernetes and engineering time
- −Enterprise pricing is only by quote
- −Free tier caps internal assistants at 100 conversations a month
- Free tier
- Developer Edition: one bot, 1,000 external or 100 internal conversations a month
- Deployment
- Self-managed (on-prem or private cloud) or managed service
- Observability
- OpenTelemetry
- Voice
- AudioCodes VoiceAI Connect IVR connector as an add-on
No. 5
TypebotAn open-source chat builder with 45+ blocks for lead capture, forms and support flows on websites and WhatsApp.
8.0of 10Best for Marketers and small businesses that want structured chat flows with flat monthly pricing.
- Capabilities
- 7.2
- Ease of setup
- 8.7
- Value
- 8.4
Price
Free plan with 200 chats a month; Starter $39 per month with 2,000 chats; Pro $89 per month with WhatsApp
Quoted from the Typebot pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Starter $39 /month
Typebot is a good fit for Botpress users whose bots are mostly structured: lead forms, quizzes, booking flows and support triage. The builder has 45+ blocks, from text and video to date pickers and payment inputs, and connects to OpenAI, Google Sheets, Zapier, Make.com and webhooks. A bot can be embedded as a page, popup or bubble, called over HTTP, or deployed on WhatsApp on the Pro plan. Pricing is simple. The free plan includes unlimited bots and 200 chats a month, Starter is $39 a month with 2 seats and 2,000 chats, and Pro is $89 with 5 seats, 10,000 chats, WhatsApp and custom domains. A chat counts once per conversation regardless of message count. Typebot is open source, so teams can self-host it. It has fewer agent features than Botpress, such as tool-calling agents or a helpdesk, so it is not the right switch for AI-first support.
What it does well
- +Free plan includes unlimited typebots and 200 chats a month
- +A chat counts once per user session, not per message
- +100% open source with APIs for developers
Where it falls short
- −WhatsApp and custom domains need the $89 Pro plan
- −Only monthly billing; no annual discount
- −Better at guided flows than open-ended AI agents
- Plans
- Free, Starter $39, Pro $89 per month
- Extra chats
- $10 per 500 on Starter
- Customers
- 650+ companies, per Typebot
- Open source
- Yes, repository on GitHub
No. 6
ChatbaseA no-code AI agent builder that trains on your content and deploys to chat, WhatsApp, email, Slack and helpdesks.
7.9of 10Best for Small businesses that want a trained support agent live in minutes without building flows.
- Capabilities
- 7.4
- Ease of setup
- 9.0
- Value
- 7.4
Price
Hobby $32 per month billed yearly with 700 message credits; Basic $120 and Business $400 billed yearly
Quoted from the Chatbase pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Hobby $32 $40 $40 $40 /month billed yearly Save $96 yearly
Chatbase is the low-effort route for Botpress users who mostly built a knowledge-base bot. You connect data sources, describe the agent's role, set guardrails and publish to chat, WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, Slack or email. Procedures written in plain language let the agent follow steps such as looking up an order and checking a return window, and widgets show interactive cards in the reply. Hobby costs $32 a month billed yearly with 700 message credits and 2 members, but API access, Zendesk, Salesforce, HubSpot and Intercom integrations, voice and the helpdesk inbox all start on Basic at $120 a month billed yearly. Each plan includes a single agent, extra agents are $25 a month, and branding removal is $99 a month. There is no visual flow canvas, which keeps setup fast but limits control compared with Botpress.
What it does well
- +Fastest setup on this list for a knowledge-based support agent
- +7-day trial on paid plans
- +Wide model choice on every plan
Where it falls short
- −API access and helpdesk integrations start on the $120 Basic plan
- −Each plan includes one agent; extras cost $25 a month
- −Removing Chatbase branding is a $99 a month add-on
- Plans
- Hobby $32, Basic $120, Business $400 per month billed yearly
- Message credits
- 700, 4,000 and 15,000 a month
- Extra credits
- $40 per 1,000
- Compliance
- GDPR and SOC 2 Type II; HIPAA-eligible on Enterprise
No. 7
Google Dialogflow CXGoogle Cloud's conversational agent service with intent-based flows and generative playbooks for chat and voice.
7.8of 10Best for Developers on Google Cloud building high-volume chat or phone agents with pay-per-request billing.
- Capabilities
- 8.6
- Ease of setup
- 6.8
- Value
- 7.8
Price
Flows chat $0.007 per request and voice $0.001 per second; Playbooks chat $0.012 per request
Quoted from the Google Dialogflow CX pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Chat $0.007 / 1 count $0.012 / 1 count
Dialogflow CX is the cloud-native alternative for teams that want to pay per request and run on Google Cloud. Agents come in two styles. Flows are deterministic, built from intents, entities, pages and state handlers on a visual graph, and Playbooks are generative agents defined by instructions, tools and data stores. Both can be mixed in one agent. Prebuilt flow components handle authentication, payments, order status and other common tasks. Voice is a strength: the Phone Gateway, Twilio, Avaya, AudioCodes, Voximplant and SIP trunks connect agents to phone lines, and Dialogflow Messenger embeds a web widget. Flows cost $0.007 per chat request or $0.001 per second of audio, and Playbooks cost $0.012 per chat request. That beats Botpress's conversation packs at low volume, but you need a Google Cloud project, IAM and webhook code to get far.
What it does well
- +Pay only per request or per second of audio
- +Strong voice and telephony options for contact centers
- +Prebuilt components save time on common banking and retail tasks
Where it falls short
- −Needs a Google Cloud project, IAM and billing setup
- −Console and concepts are developer-oriented
- −Costs scale directly with traffic, so busy bots need monitoring
- Flows pricing
- Chat $0.007 per request, voice $0.001 per second
- Playbooks pricing
- Chat $0.012 per request, voice $0.002 per second
- Editions
- Flows (intent-based) and Playbooks (generative)
- Security
- CMEK, VPC Service Controls and regional settings
Visit cloud.google.com|Read the full Google Dialogflow CX profile
No. 8
LandbotA no-code chatbot and AI agent builder for websites and WhatsApp, focused on lead generation and conversion.
7.6of 10Best for Marketing and sales teams that want a visual builder for website and WhatsApp lead capture.
- Capabilities
- 7.4
- Ease of setup
- 8.6
- Value
- 7.0
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending)
No US price was listed when we checked. See the Landbot pricing page.
Landbot is the pick for marketers who used Botpress mainly for website and WhatsApp lead flows. The visual builder and templates make it quick to put a qualifying chat on a landing page, and AI agents can now answer questions and capture leads inside those flows. HubSpot, Salesforce and 20+ other tools connect natively, with 500+ more through Zapier and n8n. Landbot says it has handled more than 1 billion chats for 12,000+ teams. Plans run from a permanent free tier with 100 chats a month to Starter, Professional and a custom Business plan, with included AI chats on each paid tier and a published price for extra chats. Branding removal and WhatsApp on your own number start at Professional. The pricing page showed euros from our location, so we list the USD price as pending. Landbot has fewer developer tools than Botpress.
What it does well
- +Permanent free plan with 100 chats a month
- +Published per-chat overage price with usage alerts at 80% and 90%
- +EU-based platform that says it does not train models on your chats
Where it falls short
- −Pricing page showed euros from our location, so the USD price is pending
- −Branding removal and your own WhatsApp number start on Professional
- −AI chats are capped per plan and billed beyond the allowance
- Free plan
- 100 chats a month, 1 seat
- Integrations
- 20+ native, 500+ via Zapier and n8n
- Scale
- 1B+ chats and 12,000+ teams, per Landbot
- Managed service
- Agent Studio builds and runs agents for you
No. 9
Amazon LexA fully managed AWS service for building voice and text bots, with Lambda for business logic and native Amazon Connect integration.
7.5of 10Best for Developers on AWS who need chat and phone bots tied to Amazon Connect and Lambda.
- Capabilities
- 8.0
- Ease of setup
- 6.2
- Value
- 8.0
Price
Pay per request: $0.004 per speech request and $0.00075 per text request
Quoted from the Amazon Lex pricing page on November 9, 2026:
2,000 text requests $0.00075
Amazon Lex is the code-first route for teams already on AWS. It is a fully managed service for voice and text bots: you define intents in the console, then use AWS Lambda functions for business logic such as checking an account or updating an order. The native Amazon Connect integration makes Lex a natural choice for phone and chat bots in an AWS contact center, and the console publishes to Facebook Messenger, Slack and Twilio SMS. Generative features draw on Amazon Bedrock models. Pricing is per request: $0.004 per speech request and $0.00075 per text request, so AWS's own example of 8,000 speech and 2,000 text requests comes to $33.50 a month. That is far cheaper than Botpress at volume, but the work shifts to developers, since Lex has no helpdesk, few web chat options and a console built for engineers.
What it does well
- +Very low per-request prices for text bots
- +Fits teams already running contact centers on Amazon Connect
- +Fully managed, with no servers to run
Where it falls short
- −Building anything useful needs Lambda code and AWS knowledge
- −Fewer ready-made web chat and helpdesk options than chat-first builders
- −Streaming voice is billed per 15-second interval, including silence
- Request pricing
- $0.004 per speech request, $0.00075 per text request
- Example
- 8,000 speech and 2,000 text requests cost $33.50 a month
- Free Tier
- New AWS customers get up to $200 in Free Tier credits
- Contact center
- Native Amazon Connect integration
No. 10
StackAIAn enterprise platform for building agentic workflows on a visual canvas, with VPC and on-premises deployment.
7.4of 10Best for Enterprises in regulated industries automating document-heavy work with AI agents.
- Capabilities
- 8.0
- Ease of setup
- 7.6
- Value
- 6.4
Price
Free plan with 500 runs a month, 2 projects and 1 seat; Enterprise by quote
Quoted from the StackAI pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Free plan $0 $0 /month /month Start for free.
StackAI is a Botpress alternative for a different job: internal agents that read documents, run analysis and take actions in business systems. Workflows are built on a visual canvas with inputs, LLM steps, Python or JavaScript code and outputs, and knowledge bases pull from document uploads, web scraping, Google Drive and Notion. Finished agents deploy as a Slack bot, Chrome extension or REST API, and StackAI lists 500+ enterprise integrations. Enterprise buyers get VPC or on-premises deployment, SSO, access control, and SOC 2, HIPAA and GDPR compliance. The free plan includes 500 runs a month, 2 projects and 1 seat, which is enough to test the builder. Every other plan is a custom Enterprise quote, so small teams cannot buy a mid-tier plan. It is weaker than Botpress for customer-facing chat on WhatsApp or web widgets.
What it does well
- +Free plan to try the builder with 500 runs a month
- +500+ enterprise integrations
- +SOC 2, HIPAA and GDPR compliance with SSO on Enterprise
Where it falls short
- −Only a free tier and custom Enterprise pricing are published
- −Built for internal workflows more than customer chat channels
- −Free plan is limited to 1 seat and 2 projects
- Free plan
- 500 runs a month, 2 projects, 1 seat
- Integrations
- 500+ enterprise integrations
- Deployment
- Multi-tenant, VPC or on-premises
- Compliance
- SOC 2, HIPAA and GDPR on Enterprise
Before you pick a product or a plan
Decide how much code you want to own
Botpress sits in the middle: a visual studio with code hooks. If you want less code, Chatbase, Landbot and Typebot let non-developers ship. If you want more control, Rasa, Dialogflow CX and Amazon Lex expect developers to write business logic in Python, webhooks or Lambda. Dify and Voiceflow keep a visual canvas but let you drop into code steps when needed.
Compare the billing unit with your traffic
Botpress bills by conversation packs. Typebot counts chats, Chatbase sells message credits, Dify includes message credits per workspace, Copilot Studio sells Copilot Credit packs, and Dialogflow CX and Amazon Lex charge per request. Take last month's Botpress conversation count and the average messages per conversation, then price it on each tool's unit.
Check channels before you migrate
List every place your Botpress bot runs today. Voiceflow, Dialogflow CX and Amazon Lex are strongest on phone lines, Copilot Studio on Teams, and Chatbase, Landbot and Typebot on web chat and WhatsApp. Dify and StackAI are better suited to web apps, APIs and internal tools than to messaging channels.
Plan for hosting and compliance
Rasa and Dify can be self-hosted, and StackAI offers VPC and on-premises deployment on Enterprise. Voiceflow lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and HIPAA, and Chatbase lists SOC 2 Type II with HIPAA eligibility on Enterprise. If your data cannot leave your own infrastructure, start with Rasa or self-hosted Dify.
Questions readers ask
- What is the best Botpress alternative in 2026?
- Voiceflow ranks first in our comparison for support teams that build chat and voice agents and need testing and release controls. Dify is the runner-up and the best value, with a free self-hosted edition and cloud plans from $590 per workspace a year. Copilot Studio is the best pick for Microsoft 365 organizations.
- Is there a free alternative to Botpress?
- Yes. Rasa's Developer Edition is free for one bot with up to 1,000 external conversations a month, Dify's Community Edition is free to self-host, and Typebot's free plan includes 200 chats a month. StackAI and Landbot also have free plans with tighter limits.
- What is the best open-source Botpress alternative?
- Dify and Typebot are both open source and offer hosted cloud plans, and Rasa offers a free license you can run locally or in production. Dify suits AI workflows and RAG apps, Typebot suits guided chat flows, and Rasa suits engineering teams building structured assistants.
- Which Botpress alternative is best for code-first developers?
- Rasa is the most code-first option, with a Python actions server and Kubernetes deployment. Dialogflow CX and Amazon Lex suit developers already on Google Cloud or AWS and charge per request, from $0.007 per chat request on Dialogflow CX Flows and $0.00075 per text request on Lex.
- Can I move my Botpress bot to another platform?
- There is no direct import between these vendors, so plan to rebuild flows and reconnect your knowledge sources. Export your knowledge base content and conversation logs first, rebuild the top intents, and run both bots side by side before switching traffic.
Spotted an error or a price change? Write to editorial@dbotmaker.io
Nobody paid to appear here and none of the links earn us money. Details are in our editorial policy. Makers change prices, plans and terms often, so check the price on their site before you buy or upgrade.