10 Best Banking Chatbots of 2026
By the DBotMaker research desk · Updated November 9, 2026 · Next review December 24, 2026 · 10 products compared
Spec sheet
Vendor-documented specs. Click a column to sort.
| Product | Free plan or trial | Setup | Banking cores | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | interface.ai | 8.5 | Check price | No | Voice, Web chat, Mobile app | Prebuilt core integrations plus 30 more, at no cost | Sales-led | Fiserv, Jack Henry, Symitar, COCC, Corelation |
| 2 | Glia | 8.4 | Check price | No | Voice, Web chat, Messaging, Video | 100+ prebuilt OLB, core and CRM integrations | Sales-led | Prebuilt core integrations; list not published |
| 3 | Posh | 8.2 | Check price | No | Voice, Web chat, Mobile app, SMS, Email | Telephony, cores, online banking, live chat and voice biometrics | Sales-led | COCC, Corelation, Fiserv, Jack Henry, Symitar |
| 4 | Backbase Conversational Banking | 7.9 | Check price | No | Mobile app, Web chat, Messaging, Voice | Banking OS and Marketplace | Sales-led | Not published (connects through Banking OS) |
| 5 | Salesforce Agentforce for Financial Services | 7.8 | $2 | No | Banking apps, Web chat, Voice, Slack | MuleSoft, Data 360, Informatica | Both | Via MuleSoft; named cores not published |
| 6 | Yellow.ai | 7.8 | $0.99 | Free plan | Web chat, Voice, Email, SMS, Messaging | 100+ out-of-the-box CRM and billing systems | Both | Not published |
| 7 | Boost.ai | 7.7 | Check price | No | Web chat, Voice, Messaging | Prebuilt integrations plus API connector | Sales-led | Not published (API connector) |
| 8 | Google Conversational Agents | 7.6 | $0.01 | No | Web chat, Mobile app, Voice, Email, Social | Google Cloud services and telephony partners | Self-serve | Not published (build with your APIs) |
| 9 | Amazon Lex | 7.5 | $0.00 | No | Voice, Mobile app, SMS, Facebook Messenger, Slack | Amazon Connect, Genesys Cloud CX, AWS Lambda, Amazon Bedrock | Self-serve | Not published (via AWS Lambda) |
| 10 | Microsoft Copilot Studio | 7.3 | $200 | No | Web chat, Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, Social channels | 1500+ prebuilt data connectors and MCP servers | Self-serve | Not published (custom connectors) |
The short version
interface.ai is the strongest pick for credit unions and community banks: its chat and voice agents complete more than 15 transactions on the core, step up authentication by risk and cite the source of every answer. Glia is the runner-up for institutions that want voice AI, digital messaging and agent assist from one vendor on a fixed price with unlimited usage, backed by PCI Level 1. Posh is the specialist for the phone channel, with a published list of core, telephony and online banking integrations. Backbase Conversational Banking, where the former kasisto.com address now points, fits larger banks on Backbase digital banking. Salesforce Agentforce suits banks already on Salesforce at $2 per conversation, Yellow.ai suits multilingual banks and has a free plan, and Boost.ai suits teams that want to build their own assistant. Google, Amazon Lex and Microsoft Copilot Studio are low-cost platforms for banks with engineering teams.
Short answer
interface.ai is the best banking chatbot for credit unions and community banks in 2026; Glia suits institutions that want voice, digital and AI on one fixed-price contract, and Posh suits teams focused on the phone channel. Yellow.ai has a free plan with 500 resolutions a month, and Amazon Lex is the cheapest metered option at $0.00075 per text request.
This list is for banks, credit unions and fintech lenders that want a chatbot to answer balance, card and loan questions, complete routine transactions and hand off to staff with context. We compared documented features and published prices for 10 products: five built for financial institutions and five platforms that banks build on. Each is scored on capabilities, ease of setup and value. The banking specialists quote on request, so their entries show a pending price check; the platforms publish US dollar prices. The spec sheet compares the core banking systems each vendor names on its own site.
Figures worth knowing
- 7%Only 7% of customers used a chatbot or digital assistant in their most recent service interaction, even though 49% said they would have been willing to use one, in Gartner's survey of 3,566 customers in early 2026.Source: Gartner
- 27%Only 27% of customers said they would be willing to try a chatbot again after a negative experience, in Gartner's 2026 survey of B2B and B2C customers.Source: Gartner
- 12%Service and support leaders invested a median 12% of their 2025 budget in AI, the highest of 10 business functions in a Gartner survey of 1,303 senior leaders.Source: Gartner
- 24%Only 24% of service and support leaders demonstrated positive financial returns across their AI use cases, according to Gartner's 2026 survey.Source: Gartner
- $41.39 billionGrand View Research forecasts the global conversational AI market will reach $41.39 billion in 2030, growing at a compound annual rate of 23.7% from 2025.Source: Grand View Research
The ranking at a glance
- 1interface.aiCredit unions and community banks that want a managed assistant that completes balance, transfer, card and loan tasks on the core.8.5
- 2GliaRegional and community banks and credit unions that want voice, digital and AI on one fixed-price contract.8.4
- 3PoshBanks and credit unions that want a phone and website assistant with in-house integrations to their core and telephony.8.2
- 4Backbase Conversational BankingBanks already on, or moving to, Backbase digital banking that want an assistant that can act on accounts.7.9
- 5Salesforce Agentforce for Financial ServicesBanks that already run Salesforce Financial Services Cloud and want agents that act on CRM and core data.7.8
- 6Yellow.aiBanks and lenders serving customers in many languages and channels that want to start on a free plan.7.8
- 7Boost.aiBanks and credit unions with an in-house team that wants to build and own its virtual agent on a no-code platform.7.7
- 8Google Conversational AgentsBanks with cloud engineering teams on Google Cloud that want to build their own assistant on metered pricing.7.6
- 9Amazon LexBanks running their contact center on Amazon Connect or their apps on AWS that want the lowest metered cost.7.5
- 10Microsoft Copilot StudioBanks on Microsoft 365 that want employee assistants first and simple customer chat on the website.7.3
How we make the call
Every entry gets a 0 to 10 rating on the three criteria below, and the order follows the weighted total. The ratings rest on the documented features and published prices on each maker's own pages, never hands-on testing.
- 40%Capabilities
- 30%Ease of setup
- 30%Value
No. 1, top ranked
interface.aiAgentic voice, chat and employee AI built only for credit unions and community banks.
8.5of 10Best for Credit unions and community banks that want a managed assistant that completes balance, transfer, card and loan tasks on the core.
- Capabilities
- 9.2
- Ease of setup
- 8.0
- Value
- 8.0
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending)
No US price was listed when we checked. See the interface.ai pricing page.
interface.ai sells three agents to credit unions and community banks: Voice AI for the phone line, Chat AI for the website and app, and Employee AI that supports staff on live calls and chats. The chat agent goes past FAQs: the vendor lists more than 15 transactional workflows completed on the core, so a member can check a balance, move money between accounts, pay a loan or card and start an application in the same conversation. Authentication scales with risk, from member ID checks for a balance to device biometrics or a one-time code for a wire to a new payee. Answers cite the exact page or disclosure they came from, and the vendor says the model is trained on NCUA and FFIEC guidance and never trains on your data. Named core partners include Fiserv, Jack Henry, Symitar, COCC and Corelation. The trade-off is a sales-led purchase with no published price, and the focus on smaller institutions means large banks may want a broader platform.
What it does well
- +Built only for credit unions and community banks
- +All necessary integrations included at no cost under the managed service
- +SOC 2 attested and CSA STAR Level 1
Where it falls short
- −No public pricing
- −Not aimed at large national banks
- −Collections and contact center products are still in early access
- Institutions live
- 100+ credit unions and community banks, per the vendor
- Volume
- 1.5M+ conversations a day, per the vendor
- Security
- SOC 2 attested, CSA STAR Level 1
No. 2
GliaBanking AI platform that combines voice AI, digital messaging and agent assist for banks and credit unions.
8.4of 10Best for Regional and community banks and credit unions that want voice, digital and AI on one fixed-price contract.
- Capabilities
- 9.0
- Ease of setup
- 7.8
- Value
- 8.2
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending)
No US price was listed when we checked. See the Glia pricing page.
Glia started in digital customer service and now sells itself as a banking AI platform for regional and community institutions. Glia Banker is the voice AI, which the vendor says covers more than 1,000 banking tasks out of the box and can automate up to 80% of inquiries, and the same platform runs chat, messaging and video sessions with human staff. CoPilot gives agents approved knowledge and cross-sell prompts during the conversation, and AI Outreach runs outbound campaigns for CD renewals and payment reminders. Glia lists more than 100 prebuilt integrations with online banking platforms, cores and CRMs, and is a Q2 Strategic Reseller. On compliance it cites PCI Level 1 at the application level on top of SOC 2 Type II, and it offers a contractual guarantee against hallucinations and prompt injections. Pricing is a fixed fee with unlimited seats and usage, but the page publishes no figure, so you still need a quote.
What it does well
- +Fixed price with unlimited seats and usage under Priceless Pricing
- +PCI Level 1 and SOC 2 Type II
- +Contractual guarantee against hallucinations and prompt injections
Where it falls short
- −No published price figure
- −Sales-led onboarding
- −Broad suite can be more than a small institution needs
- Institutions
- 700+ banks, credit unions and FIs, per the vendor
- Uptime
- 99.9999%, per the vendor
- Partners
- Q2, Candescent, CU*Answers, Blend
No. 3
PoshVoice and digital AI assistants plus employee knowledge tools built for banks and credit unions.
8.2of 10Best for Banks and credit unions that want a phone and website assistant with in-house integrations to their core and telephony.
- Capabilities
- 8.7
- Ease of setup
- 8.0
- Value
- 7.8
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending)
No US price was listed when we checked. See the Posh pricing page.
Posh builds AI for financial institutions only, with customer-facing products for the phone and the website and employee products for training and quality review. The Voice Assistant answers FAQs, routes calls and completes banking transactions, while the Digital Assistant covers the website and mobile app and, per the vendor, also reaches SMS and email. Posh says it builds and maintains its integrations in-house, and the list is specific: cores including COCC, Corelation, Fiserv, Jack Henry and Symitar; online banking from Alkami, Q2, Lumin Digital and others; telephony from Avaya, Cisco, Genesys, NICE and Twilio; and voice biometrics from Pindrop. That is what lets the assistant check balances and make transfers rather than only answer questions. CoachQA scores every contact center conversation against your procedures, which helps compliance teams. There is no published price and the product is sold through demos, so budget for a sales cycle.
What it does well
- +Integrations built and maintained in-house
- +Long list of named telephony and online banking partners
- +Go live in weeks with a US-based implementation team
Where it falls short
- −No public pricing
- −US banks and credit unions only in practice
- −Fewer self-serve tools than general platforms
- Clients
- 150+ banks and credit unions, per the vendor
- Online banking
- Alkami, Apiture, Fiserv, Lumin Digital, NCR, Q2
- Voice biometrics
- Pindrop, illuma
No. 4
Backbase Conversational BankingChat and voice banking assistant inside the Backbase Banking OS; the former kasisto.com address now redirects to Backbase.
7.9of 10Best for Banks already on, or moving to, Backbase digital banking that want an assistant that can act on accounts.
- Capabilities
- 8.9
- Ease of setup
- 7.0
- Value
- 7.3
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending)
No US price was listed when we checked. See the Backbase Conversational Banking pricing page.
Kasisto was one of the best-known banking assistant vendors, and kasisto.com now redirects to Backbase, whose Conversational Banking product covers the same ground inside its Banking OS. Customers can type or speak a request in the mobile app, on the web, in messaging or on a voice line, and the assistant can show balances, block a lost card, raise a card limit, dispute a payment or continue an application. Every action runs through access, policy and approval checks set by the bank, and exceptions go to an authorized employee with the context attached, so the customer does not start again. Backbase quotes Nedbank, whose assistant Enbi has served more than 2.3 million clients and cut live chat volume by more than 75%. The fit is strongest for banks that already run Backbase for online and mobile banking; as a stand-alone chatbot it is a heavier purchase than the specialists above, and pricing is not published.
What it does well
- +Actions run inside the bank's own policies and approvals
- +Same controls across chat and voice
- +Proven at scale at Nedbank, per the vendor
Where it falls short
- −No public pricing
- −Best value when you also run Backbase digital banking
- −Enterprise sales cycle
- Reference
- Nedbank Enbi: 2.3M+ clients and >75% fewer live chats, per the vendor
- Launch plan
- 90-day launch plan offered
- Channels
- Chat in mobile, web and messaging; voice
Visit backbase.com|Read the full Backbase Conversational Banking profile
No. 5
Salesforce Agentforce for Financial ServicesSalesforce AI agents with prebuilt financial services data models, workflows and compliance controls.
7.8of 10Best for Banks that already run Salesforce Financial Services Cloud and want agents that act on CRM and core data.
- Capabilities
- 8.6
- Ease of setup
- 7.0
- Value
- 7.6
Price
$2 per conversation for customer-facing agents; free trial available
Quoted from the Salesforce Agentforce for Financial Services pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Pay per Conversation as you scale Agentforce. $ 2 USD/Per conversation
Agentforce for Financial Services is Salesforce's agent layer tuned for banking, wealth, insurance and lending. It ships prebuilt data models, workflows and agent templates that teams extend with the low-code Agentforce Builder or natural-language Agentforce Script, and Salesforce lists examples such as resolving card disputes and running collections workflows with handoff to staff. Compliance is the main selling point for banks: the Trust Layer promises zero data retention by external AI models, automatic PII masking and an immutable audit trail of every action, and Salesforce cites SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27018 and PCI DSS v4.0.1 Level 1. Data from core banking systems arrives through MuleSoft, Data 360 and Informatica, which is flexible but means an integration project. Customer-facing agents are priced at $2 per conversation. That price is easy to model, but at high balance-check volume a flat-fee specialist can work out cheaper.
What it does well
- +Published per-conversation price
- +SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27018 and PCI DSS v4.0.1 Level 1
- +Strong fit with existing Salesforce data
Where it falls short
- −Needs Salesforce expertise to configure
- −Core connections run through MuleSoft projects
- −Per-conversation costs add up at high volume
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27018, PCI DSS v4.0.1 Level 1
- Builders
- Agentforce Builder, Agentforce Script
- Trial
- Free trial offered
Visit salesforce.com|Read the full Salesforce Agentforce for Financial Services profile
No. 6
Yellow.aiAgentic chat, voice and email automation platform with a dedicated banking and financial services offering.
7.8of 10Best for Banks and lenders serving customers in many languages and channels that want to start on a free plan.
- Capabilities
- 8.0
- Ease of setup
- 7.5
- Value
- 7.8
Price
Free plan with 500 resolutions a month, then $0.99 per resolution; Enterprise is custom
Quoted from the Yellow.ai pricing page on November 9, 2026:
500/month included, then $0.99 per resolution
Yellow.ai is a general enterprise automation platform with a specific banking, financial services and insurance offering. Its BFSI page lists the typical banking jobs: FAQs on interest rates, loan eligibility and account opening, plus voice agents that block or replace cards and respond to fraud alerts, with language switching and interruption handling. The vendor claims 35+ channels, 135+ languages, 150+ prebuilt templates and 100+ out-of-the-box CRM and billing integrations, and lists ISO, HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR and PDPA compliance plus PCI-DSS v4.0.1 service provider compliance in North America. Handoffs reach a live agent with a chat summary. UnionBank of Philippines is the published reference, with AI agent operating costs down 51%. Unlike the US banking specialists, Yellow.ai does not name core banking connectors, so account actions depend on your APIs. The free plan includes 500 resolutions a month, then $0.99 per resolution.
What it does well
- +Free plan to test before a contract
- +Wide language and channel coverage
- +ISO, SOC 2, GDPR, PDPA and PCI-DSS v4.0.1 service provider compliance in North America
Where it falls short
- −Free plan limits agents and features
- −No named core banking integrations
- −Enterprise pricing is custom
- Languages
- 135+ for banking service, per the BFSI page
- Reference
- UnionBank of Philippines cut AI agent OPEX 51%, per the vendor
- Free plan
- 500 resolutions a month
No. 7
Boost.aiConversational and voice AI platform for regulated industries, being acquired by Automation Anywhere.
7.7of 10Best for Banks and credit unions with an in-house team that wants to build and own its virtual agent on a no-code platform.
- Capabilities
- 8.4
- Ease of setup
- 7.3
- Value
- 7.1
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending)
No US price was listed when we checked. See the Boost.ai pricing page.
Boost.ai is a Norwegian conversational AI platform with a long record in banking, insurance and telecom, and MSU Federal Credit Union is among the institutions quoted on its site. The platform combines classic intent recognition with generative and agentic AI, which suits banks that want tight control over what the assistant says. A no-code builder and prebuilt industry modules with compliance guardrails let an in-house team build flows, and test studios simulate users to find jailbreaks and knowledge gaps before launch. Integrations cover channels, contact centers, authentication and voice, and an API connector reaches anything else, but no core banking systems are named. Boost.ai cites ISO 27001 and 27701 certification, GDPR compliance and an independent SOC 2 report, and more than 36 languages. On October 7, 2026, Automation Anywhere announced a definitive agreement to acquire the company, with closing expected in Q4 2026, so ask about the roadmap and contract terms.
What it does well
- +ISO 27001 and 27701 certified, SOC 2 report, GDPR compliant
- +36+ languages
- +Long record in financial services and credit unions
Where it falls short
- −No public pricing
- −Acquisition by Automation Anywhere expected to close in Q4 2026
- −No named core banking connectors
- Languages
- 36+, per the acquisition announcement
- Ownership
- Definitive agreement to join Automation Anywhere, announced October 7, 2026
- Resolution rate
- 90%+ in production deployments, per the vendor
No. 8
Google Conversational AgentsGoogle Cloud's Gemini-powered platform for building chat and voice agents, formerly Dialogflow CX.
7.6of 10Best for Banks with cloud engineering teams on Google Cloud that want to build their own assistant on metered pricing.
- Capabilities
- 7.8
- Ease of setup
- 6.6
- Value
- 8.4
Price
Chat from $0.007 per request on Flows; free trial credits for new Google Cloud users
Quoted from the Google Conversational Agents pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Chat $0.007 / 1 count
Google Conversational Agents, the successor to Dialogflow CX, is a build-it-yourself platform rather than a banking product. CX Agent Studio, powered by Gemini, gives teams prebuilt agent templates, evaluation tools and a visual builder, and agents can serve web, mobile, voice, email and social channels with voice in over 40 languages. For a bank, the work is in the integrations: balance, card and loan answers need your own APIs behind the agent, plus your own authentication and compliance review. In return the price is low and published, starting at $0.007 per chat request on Flows, and new Google Cloud users get trial credits. It suits a bank with an engineering team already on Google Cloud; a credit union without developers will get further, faster with a specialist that ships core integrations.
What it does well
- +Low published per-request price
- +Self-serve start on Google Cloud
- +Strong voice and language coverage
Where it falls short
- −No banking workflows out of the box
- −Requires engineers to connect core systems
- −Usage billing is harder to forecast
- Languages
- Over 40 for voice self-service
- Chat price
- $0.007 per request on Flows
- Builder
- CX Agent Studio
Visit cloud.google.com|Read the full Google Conversational Agents profile
No. 9
Amazon LexAWS managed service for building voice and text bots, with native Amazon Connect integration.
7.5of 10Best for Banks running their contact center on Amazon Connect or their apps on AWS that want the lowest metered cost.
- Capabilities
- 7.4
- Ease of setup
- 6.5
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Pay per request from $0.00075 per text request; AWS Free Tier credits for new customers
Quoted from the Amazon Lex pricing page on November 9, 2026:
2,000 text requests $0.00075
Amazon Lex is the AWS building block for conversational interfaces, and it is the cheapest documented option in this list at $0.00075 per text request. Lex handles language understanding for voice and text, then calls AWS Lambda functions for business logic, which is where a bank would look up a balance, check a card status or fetch a loan payoff from its own systems. It integrates natively with Amazon Connect, so banks already on that contact center can put a bot in front of the phone and chat queues, and it also deploys to Genesys Cloud CX, Facebook Messenger, Slack and Twilio SMS. Amazon Bedrock integration adds generative answers from your documents. Everything banking-specific, from authentication to compliance review, is yours to build, so Lex only makes sense with an AWS engineering team.
What it does well
- +Lowest published per-request price in this list
- +Native fit with Amazon Connect contact centers
- +Runs inside the bank's own AWS account
Where it falls short
- −No banking content or workflows included
- −Needs developers for every integration
- −Console and Lambda setup is technical
- Text price
- $0.00075 per request
- Contact centers
- Amazon Connect, Genesys Cloud CX
- Back end
- AWS Lambda
No. 10
Microsoft Copilot StudioMicrosoft's no-code platform for building custom agents, workflows and apps, formerly Power Virtual Agents.
7.3of 10Best for Banks on Microsoft 365 that want employee assistants first and simple customer chat on the website.
- Capabilities
- 7.5
- Ease of setup
- 7.0
- Value
- 7.4
Price
$200 per month for a pack of 25,000 Copilot Credits, or pay as you go
Quoted from the Microsoft Copilot Studio pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Copilot Credit capacity packs of 25,000 Copilot Credits each, priced at $200.00 /pack/month
Copilot Studio is Microsoft's platform for building agents with no code, and it now includes what used to be Power Virtual Agents. Teams describe an agent in natural language or build it in a graphical editor, connect it to data through more than 1,500 prebuilt connectors and MCP servers, and publish it to a website, social channels, Teams or SharePoint. For banks the main draw is governance: automated evaluations, version control and a dev, test and production lifecycle that IT departments already know. Microsoft names no banking templates or core connectors, so a customer-facing balance or card assistant needs custom connectors and careful review, and many banks start with internal agents for branch staff and the contact center. Pricing is $200 a month per pack of 25,000 Copilot Credits, or pay as you go, which needs modeling against your expected volume.
What it does well
- +Fits banks already standardized on Microsoft 365
- +Large connector catalog
- +Governance and lifecycle tools for IT
Where it falls short
- −No banking templates or core connectors named
- −Credit-based billing needs modeling
- −Better suited to internal agents than member-facing banking
- Connectors
- 1500+ prebuilt data connectors
- Models
- 11K+ via Azure AI Foundry
- Price
- $200 per 25,000 Copilot Credits a month
Visit microsoft.com|Read the full Microsoft Copilot Studio profile
Before you pick a product or a plan
Ask which transactions finish on the core
Answering FAQs about rates and branch hours is the easy part. The value comes from a bot that checks balances, moves money, blocks cards and takes loan payments on your core. interface.ai lists more than 15 transactional workflows, Posh names COCC, Corelation, Fiserv, Jack Henry and Symitar, and Glia lists more than 100 prebuilt integrations with online banking platforms, cores and CRMs. Ask each vendor for a live demo against your core.
Match authentication to the risk of each request
A rate question needs no login, a balance needs a verified member, and a transfer to a new payee needs more. Look for authentication that steps up by request type, such as interface.ai's step-up to device biometrics or a one-time code, and voice biometrics partners such as Pindrop on the phone line.
Check the compliance evidence
Ask for the SOC 2 report and, if card data can appear in a conversation, PCI DSS evidence. Glia and Salesforce cite PCI Level 1, Yellow.ai cites PCI-DSS v4.0.1 service provider compliance in North America, interface.ai is SOC 2 attested and Boost.ai holds ISO 27001 and 27701. Also ask whether your conversations train the vendor's models and how answers are logged for examiners.
Choose a banking specialist or a platform
interface.ai, Glia, Posh and Backbase ship banking workflows and integrations and run the rollout with you. Google, Amazon Lex and Microsoft Copilot Studio cost less per conversation but leave every banking integration, authentication flow and compliance review to your own team. Salesforce, Yellow.ai and Boost.ai sit in between.
Model the cost at your volume
Metered prices look small until you multiply them by monthly balance checks. Amazon Lex charges $0.00075 per text request, Google $0.007 per chat request on Flows, Yellow.ai $0.99 per resolution after 500 free each month, and Salesforce $2 per conversation. Glia sells a fixed price with unlimited usage. Estimate your monthly conversations and turns before comparing quotes.
Questions readers ask
- What is the best banking chatbot in 2026?
- interface.ai ranks first in our comparison for credit unions and community banks because its chat and voice agents complete more than 15 transactions on the core with risk-based authentication. Glia is the runner-up for institutions that want voice, digital and AI on one fixed-price contract.
- Can a banking chatbot check balances and block cards?
- Yes, when it is connected to your core and card systems. interface.ai, Posh and Backbase all show balance checks and card actions in their products, and Yellow.ai's voice agents handle card blocking and replacement. General platforms such as Amazon Lex need your developers to build those lookups.
- How much does a banking chatbot cost?
- Platforms publish prices: Amazon Lex charges $0.00075 per text request, Google $0.007 per chat request, Yellow.ai $0.99 per resolution after a free 500 a month, Salesforce $2 per conversation, and Microsoft Copilot Studio $200 a month for 25,000 credits. interface.ai, Glia, Posh, Backbase and Boost.ai quote on request.
- Are banking chatbots compliant?
- Compliance depends on the vendor and your setup. Glia and Salesforce cite PCI Level 1, interface.ai is SOC 2 attested and says it is trained on NCUA and FFIEC guidance, and Boost.ai holds ISO 27001 and 27701. Ask for audit reports, data retention terms and how answers are logged before launch.
- What happened to Kasisto?
- The kasisto.com address now redirects to Backbase, which sells chat and voice banking assistance as Conversational Banking inside its Banking OS. Customers can check balances, block cards and dispute payments in conversation, with bank-defined approval checks.
- Which banking chatbot is best for credit unions?
- interface.ai, Glia and Posh all focus on credit unions and community banks. interface.ai has the deepest chat transactions, Glia covers voice, digital and outreach on one fixed price, and Posh publishes the longest list of named core and telephony integrations.
Spotted an error or a price change? Write to editorial@dbotmaker.io
Nobody paid to appear here and none of the links earn us money. Details are in our editorial policy. Makers change prices, plans and terms often, so check the price on their site before you buy or upgrade.