dbotmakerthe decision bot
Software & AI · Ranking

9 Best n8n Alternatives of 2026

By the DBotMaker research desk · Updated November 9, 2026 · Next review December 24, 2026 · 9 products compared

Ranked firstActivepiecesTeams that want n8n's self-hosting freedom under a permissive MIT license and a flat monthly price.8.9

Spec sheet

Vendor-documented specs. Click a column to sort.

ProductFree plan or trialSetupBilling unit
1Activepieces8.9$20Free planWeb, Self-hosted770+ integrationsBothCredits, 1 per run
2Make8.7Free planFree planWeb1,000+ standard appsBothCredits, most actions use 1
3Zapier8.6$19.99Free planWeb, Chrome extension9,000+ appsBothTasks
4Windmill8.5$120Free planWeb, Self-hosted20+ languagesBothSeats plus compute units
5Latenode8.4FreeFree planWeb5,500+ integrationsSelf-serveCPU seconds
6Kestra8.1Free planFree planWeb, Self-hosted2,600+ pluginsBothPer instance, unlimited executions
7Gumloop8.0$3714-day trialWebNot publishedBothCredits, 20k a month on Pro
8Microsoft Power Automate8.0$1530-day trialWeb, WindowsStandard and premium connectorsBothPer user or per bot
9Tray.ai7.6$50NoWeb5,000+ apps, databases, APIs and servicesBothTasks and Helix Compute Units

The short version

Activepieces is the most direct swap for n8n: an MIT licensed core you can self-host, 1 credit per run however many steps it has, and a flat $20 Plus plan. Make is the better choice if you are ready to stop hosting and want a mature visual canvas, though it counts credits per action rather than per run. Zapier has the biggest catalog at 9,000+ apps but the weakest per-run economics. Windmill and Kestra are the developer picks, both open source with unlimited executions when self-hosted. Latenode bills for CPU time with no base fee, Power Automate fits Microsoft shops that need desktop RPA, Gumloop is a hosted home for AI agents, and Tray.ai is built for IT-governed programs.

Short answer

Activepieces is the best n8n alternative for teams that want open-source self-hosting and run-based billing in 2026; Make suits teams ready to move to a hosted visual builder; Latenode is the cheapest paid option, with no base fee and 100,000 CPU seconds a month for $10.80.

This list is for teams running n8n who want out because of its license, its execution pricing, or the work of keeping a self-hosted server alive. n8n's Community Edition uses the Sustainable Use License, which allows use for your own internal business purposes but not reselling it, and its cloud plans bill per workflow execution. The alternatives below split into open-source tools you can host yourself (Activepieces, Windmill, Kestra), hosted builders (Make, Zapier, Latenode), and AI or enterprise platforms (Gumloop, Tray.ai, Power Automate). We compared documented features and published prices on each vendor's own pages and scored capabilities at 40%, ease of setup at 30% and value at 30%. Starting prices are the cheapest paid plan in USD. Make did not show plan prices to us and Kestra sells paid plans by quote, so both are marked pending. Relay.app shut down in September 2026, Pipedream now sells a developer connector product, and Node-RED is a free community project with no vendor plan, so none of them are ranked.

Figures worth knowing

The ranking at a glance

  1. 1ActivepiecesTeams that want n8n's self-hosting freedom under a permissive MIT license and a flat monthly price.8.9
  2. 2MakeTeams happy to leave self-hosting behind for a polished visual canvas and a large app catalog.8.7
  3. 3ZapierNon-technical teams that want the widest app catalog and the easiest setup, and accept task-based pricing.8.6
  4. 4WindmillEngineering teams that outgrew n8n's node editor and want workflows written in real code with unlimited executions.8.5
  5. 5LatenodeTeams that like n8n's code-friendly canvas but want cloud hosting priced on runtime.8.4
  6. 6KestraPlatform and data teams that want event-driven orchestration with unlimited executions on their own infrastructure.8.1
  7. 7GumloopTeams that used n8n mainly for AI agent workflows and want a hosted, no-code agent builder.8.0
  8. 8Microsoft Power AutomateCompanies standardized on Microsoft 365 that need desktop automation alongside cloud workflows.8.0
  9. 9Tray.aiIT teams that need governance, managed credentials and enterprise integrations rather than a single team's automations.7.6

How we make the call

Every entry gets a 0 to 10 rating on the three criteria below, and the order follows the weighted total. The ratings rest on the documented features and published prices on each maker's own pages, never hands-on testing.

  • 40%Capabilities
  • 30%Ease of setup
  • 30%Value

See the full method

  1. No. 1, top ranked

    Activepieces

    An open-source automation builder for flows, AI agents and tables that runs in the cloud or on your own servers.

    8.9of 10

    Best for Teams that want n8n's self-hosting freedom under a permissive MIT license and a flat monthly price.

    Capabilities
    8.6
    Ease of setup
    8.8
    Value
    9.3

    Price

    Free plan; Plus is $20 flat per month

    Quoted from the Activepieces pricing page on November 9, 2026: Plus For daily builders $20 flat per month

    Activepieces is the closest match to what most teams like about n8n, without the license questions. Its Community Edition is released under the MIT license, so you can run it on your own servers and build products on top of it, which n8n's Sustainable Use License restricts to internal business use. Billing works much like n8n's execution model: a run costs 1 credit however many steps it has, and only AI steps cost more, at 2, 10 or 20 credits depending on the model, or 1 credit if you connect your own provider keys on Plus and above. The Free plan includes 1,000 credits a month, unlimited flows and up to 5 users. Plus is $20 flat per month with 10,000 credits, and overage is $0.007 per credit. The limits show up as teams grow: Plus still caps you at 5 users, and SSO only arrives on the $200 Team plan.

    What it does well

    • +Community Edition is released under the MIT license
    • +Plus is a flat $20 a month for up to 5 users
    • +Free plan has unlimited flows and 1,000 credits a month

    Where it falls short

    • −Free and Plus plans stop at 5 users
    • −SSO starts on the $200 Team plan
    • −AI steps cost 2 to 20 credits unless you bring your own keys
    Free plan
    Yes, 1,000 credits a month
    Paid plans
    Plus $20, Team $200, Ultimate custom
    Overage
    $0.007 per credit on Plus and Team
    License
    MIT for Community Edition
    Billing unit
    Credits, 1 per run

    Visit activepieces.com|Read the full Activepieces profile

  2. No. 2

    Make

    A cloud automation platform where visual scenarios are billed in credits for each module action.

    8.7of 10

    Best for Teams happy to leave self-hosting behind for a polished visual canvas and a large app catalog.

    Capabilities
    9.0
    Ease of setup
    8.4
    Value
    8.6

    Price

    See vendor pricing (USD check pending)

    No US price was listed when we checked. See the Make pricing page.

    Make is the strongest cloud option for n8n users who are tired of running servers and want a canvas that business staff can follow. Its pricing page says it offers integrations with more than 1,000 third party apps out of the box, plus Custom Apps for any service with a public API and more than 300 REST API endpoints for managing the platform itself. The tradeoff against n8n is the billing unit. n8n charges per full workflow execution, while Make counts credits for each module action, so reading a record, transforming it and writing it elsewhere is three credits per run. Router and error handler modules are free, which keeps branching cheap. When credits run out, scenarios pause but incoming webhooks queue up to your storage limit. Credits expire at the end of the term, and the page did not show plan prices to us, so the starting price is pending.

    What it does well

    • +Router and error handler modules use no credits
    • +Free plan includes 1,000 credits a month
    • +Start-up Plan gives qualifying teams under 20 employees 50% off Business

    Where it falls short

    • −Every action costs credits, so long scenarios cost more per run than on n8n
    • −Plan prices did not display for us, so the entry price is pending
    • −Unused credits expire at the end of the term
    Free plan
    Yes, 1,000 credits a month
    Paid plans
    Core, Pro, Teams and Enterprise
    Billing unit
    Credits, most actions use 1
    Data stores
    Up to 1,000 per organization
    Start-up offer
    50% off Business for teams under 20 employees

    Visit make.com|Read the full Make profile

  3. No. 3

    Zapier

    The best known no-code automation platform, with Zaps, Tables, Forms and agents across 9,000+ apps.

    8.6of 10

    Best for Non-technical teams that want the widest app catalog and the easiest setup, and accept task-based pricing.

    Capabilities
    9.2
    Ease of setup
    9.3
    Value
    7.0

    Price

    Free plan; Professional from $19.99 a month

    Quoted from the Zapier pricing page on November 9, 2026: Professional Starting from $19.99 /month

    Zapier is where many teams started before n8n, and it remains the easiest tool here for people who do not write code. Its pricing page lists more than 9,000 apps, and Zaps, Tables and Forms come together on every plan. The Free plan includes 100 tasks a month but limits you to two-step Zaps. Professional starts at $19.99 a month and adds multi-step Zaps, unlimited premium apps, webhooks and AI fields. Team starts at $69 a month for 25 users with shared Zaps, shared app connections and SAML SSO. For n8n users, the catch is cost on long workflows: Zapier bills by task, while n8n bills a whole execution once however many steps it has. There is also no self-hosted edition, so teams that moved to n8n for data control will not get that back. Zapier also sells agents and an MCP server for AI assistants.

    What it does well

    • +Largest app catalog on this list at 9,000+ apps
    • +Free plan includes 100 tasks a month
    • +Simplest builder for non-technical staff

    Where it falls short

    • −Free plan only allows two-step Zaps
    • −Billing counts tasks, which adds up on long workflows compared with n8n executions
    • −No self-hosted edition
    Free plan
    Yes, 100 tasks a month
    Paid plans
    Professional, Team and Enterprise
    Team plan
    From $69 a month, 25 users
    Apps
    9,000+
    Billing unit
    Tasks

    Visit zapier.com|Read the full Zapier profile

  4. No. 4

    Windmill

    An open-source, code-first platform for scripts, flows, data pipelines and internal apps that you can self-host.

    8.5of 10

    Best for Engineering teams that outgrew n8n's node editor and want workflows written in real code with unlimited executions.

    Capabilities
    9.0
    Ease of setup
    7.2
    Value
    9.2

    Price

    Free self-hosted edition; Enterprise from $120 a month

    Quoted from the Windmill pricing page on November 9, 2026: Enterprise from $ 120 /mo

    Windmill suits teams whose n8n workflows have turned into code nodes with a little canvas around them. Every step is a script, written in Python, TypeScript, Go, Bash, SQL, Rust or other supported languages, and those scripts compose into flows, data pipelines, AI agents or full React and Svelte apps. The free self-hosted Community Edition has unlimited executions, up to 50 users, 3 workspaces and SSO for 10 users, and the repository is published under AGPLv3 and Apache 2.0. Paid Enterprise starts from $120 a month and is priced on seats and compute: the page lists $20 a month per builder, $10 per non-builder and $50 per standard worker, with a calculator to model your setup. Enterprise adds audit logs, SAML, Kafka and SQS triggers, a commercial license and 24/7 support. Business users will find it less approachable than a drag and drop tool.

    What it does well

    • +Free Community Edition has unlimited executions
    • +Open source under AGPLv3 and Apache 2.0
    • +Non-builder seats cost half of builder seats on Enterprise

    Where it falls short

    • −Code-first, so it suits developers more than business users
    • −Free edition caps SSO at 10 users
    • −Kafka, SQS and other queue triggers need Enterprise
    Free plan
    Yes, self-hosted Community Edition
    Executions
    Unlimited on the free edition
    Builder seat
    $20 a month on Enterprise
    Worker
    $50 a month per standard worker
    Billing unit
    Seats plus compute units

    Visit windmill.dev|Read the full Windmill profile

  5. No. 5

    Latenode

    A visual automation platform with JavaScript in any node that bills for CPU time instead of steps.

    8.4of 10

    Best for Teams that like n8n's code-friendly canvas but want cloud hosting priced on runtime.

    Capabilities
    8.3
    Ease of setup
    8.0
    Value
    9.0

    Price

    Free plan; pay as you go with no base fee, 100,000 CPU seconds cost $10.80

    Quoted from the Latenode pricing page on November 9, 2026: 100,000 short workflows/month About 1 second each $10.80

    Latenode takes a different route to the same goal as n8n's execution pricing: it charges for runtime, not for steps. The first 10,000 CPU seconds each month are free, and after that the rate starts at $0.00012 per CPU second and falls in brackets as volume grows. Its own example puts 100,000 short workflows of about 1 second each at $10.80 a month. There is no base fee, and you can set a spending limit before paid usage starts. The canvas allows JavaScript in any node, which will feel familiar to n8n users, and the platform adds a headless browser, access to 335+ LLM models, tables and RAG. The Free plan is tight, with 5 active workflows, 1 parallel worker and 3 minutes per run, and paid usage raises that to unlimited scenarios, 5 workers and 10 minutes. Workflows that wait on slow APIs cost more under this model.

    What it does well

    • +No base fee, and the first 10,000 CPU seconds each month are free
    • +Extra workflow steps do not multiply the bill by themselves
    • +Spending limit can be set before paid usage starts

    Where it falls short

    • −Free plan allows only 5 active workflows and 3 minutes per run
    • −Bills grow with runtime, so slow API calls cost more
    • −No self-hosted edition on its pricing page
    Free plan
    Yes, 10,000 CPU seconds a month
    Paid plan
    Pay as you go, no base fee
    Rate
    From $0.00012 per CPU second, falling with volume
    Run limit
    10 minutes per run when paying
    Billing unit
    CPU seconds

    Visit latenode.com|Read the full Latenode profile

  6. No. 6

    Kestra

    An open-source, declarative orchestration platform for data, infrastructure and AI workflows defined as code.

    8.1of 10

    Best for Platform and data teams that want event-driven orchestration with unlimited executions on their own infrastructure.

    Capabilities
    8.8
    Ease of setup
    6.8
    Value
    8.6

    Price

    See vendor pricing (USD check pending)

    No US price was listed when we checked. See the Kestra pricing page.

    Kestra is the pick when n8n has turned into a scheduler for data jobs and infrastructure tasks. Workflows, triggers and dependencies are defined declaratively as code, so they can be versioned, reviewed and promoted across environments, and the same flows can be edited in a no-code editor. Kestra lists 2,600+ plugins covering SQL, Python, shell, APIs, Terraform, dbt and Spark, plus an MCP server for AI agents. The open source edition is published under the Apache 2.0 license with unlimited flows and executions and a queue on PostgreSQL or MySQL. Enterprise Edition is an annual subscription per instance, again with unlimited flows, tasks and executions, and adds SSO, LDAP, SCIM, RBAC, audit logs, worker groups and secrets management. Kestra Cloud is a managed version for teams that do not want to run it. Paid prices are by quote, and the tool is built for engineers rather than business staff.

    What it does well

    • +Open source under the Apache 2.0 license
    • +Unlimited flows and executions in the open source edition
    • +Enterprise is priced per instance, not per run

    Where it falls short

    • −Enterprise and Cloud prices are by quote only
    • −Aimed at engineers, not business users
    • −SSO, RBAC and audit logs need Enterprise
    Free plan
    Yes, open source edition
    Plugins
    2,600+
    License
    Apache 2.0
    Enterprise pricing
    Annual subscription per instance
    Billing unit
    Per instance, unlimited executions

    Visit kestra.io|Read the full Kestra profile

  7. No. 7

    Gumloop

    An AI agent platform where teams build agents that work across company tools, with credits for model usage.

    8.0of 10

    Best for Teams that used n8n mainly for AI agent workflows and want a hosted, no-code agent builder.

    Capabilities
    8.0
    Ease of setup
    8.6
    Value
    7.4

    Price

    14-day free trial; Pro from $37 a month

    Quoted from the Gumloop pricing page on November 9, 2026: Pro Starts at $37 / month

    Gumloop is a fit for teams whose n8n usage has shifted from moving data between apps to running AI agents. Pro starts at $37 a month after a 14-day free trial and includes unlimited agents, 35+ models with custom proxy support, 20,000 credits a month and unlimited seats and teams with shared credentials. You can bring your own API keys, and Pro carries an 8% orchestration fee, with discounts available. Developers get the Gumloop MCP and a CLI, and Enterprise adds SCIM and SAML, audit logs, a virtual private cloud option and AI model access controls. For n8n users the main shift is that Gumloop is agent-first: its pricing page now lists Workflows as legacy, with 5 concurrent workflow runs on Pro, so deterministic, high volume automations are a weaker match. There is no self-hosted edition and no permanent free plan.

    What it does well

    • +Unlimited seats on Pro
    • +20,000 credits a month included on Pro
    • +Bring your own keys to control model spend

    Where it falls short

    • −No permanent free plan
    • −Pro adds an 8% orchestration fee
    • −Workflows are now marked as legacy in favor of agents
    Free trial
    14 days
    Pro
    From $37 a month
    Credits
    20,000 a month on Pro
    Concurrent workflow runs
    5 on Pro
    Billing unit
    Credits, 20k a month on Pro

    Visit gumloop.com|Read the full Gumloop profile

  8. No. 8

    Microsoft Power Automate

    Microsoft's automation suite for cloud flows, desktop RPA and process mining inside Microsoft 365.

    8.0of 10

    Best for Companies standardized on Microsoft 365 that need desktop automation alongside cloud workflows.

    Capabilities
    8.5
    Ease of setup
    7.6
    Value
    7.8

    Price

    30-day free trial; Premium from $15 per user per month billed annually

    Quoted from the Microsoft Power Automate pricing page on November 9, 2026: Power Automate Premium $15.00 user/month, paid yearly

    Power Automate is the n8n alternative for organizations that already pay for Microsoft 365 and need more than API automation. Power Automate Premium costs $15.00 per user per month paid yearly and includes cloud flows, attended desktop flows, process and task mining with 50 MB of data, and Dataverse storage. Unattended automation moves to the Process plan at $150 per bot per month, or $215 for Hosted Process, which runs on a virtual machine managed by Microsoft on Azure. That pricing is per user or per bot rather than per execution, which can be cheaper than n8n for a few heavy users and more expensive for a large team of occasional ones. The 30-day trial covers cloud flows with standard connectors. There is no self-hosted server, though desktop flows do run on your own Windows machines.

    What it does well

    • +Premium is $15 per user per month billed annually
    • +Desktop RPA covers apps that have no API
    • +Dataverse storage is included with each plan

    Where it falls short

    • −Unattended bots start at $150 per bot per month
    • −Licensing across user, bot and add-on plans takes study
    • −No self-hosted server like n8n's Community Edition
    Free trial
    30 days
    Premium
    $15 per user per month, paid yearly
    Process
    $150 per bot per month, paid yearly
    Hosted Process
    $215 per bot per month, paid yearly
    Billing unit
    Per user or per bot

    Visit microsoft.com|Read the full Microsoft Power Automate profile

  9. No. 9

    Tray.ai

    A governed iPaaS and runtime for integrations, automations, AI-built apps and MCP tools, billed on usage.

    7.6of 10

    Best for IT teams that need governance, managed credentials and enterprise integrations rather than a single team's automations.

    Capabilities
    8.6
    Ease of setup
    7.0
    Value
    6.8

    Price

    Free trial; from $50 a month

    Quoted from the Tray.ai pricing page on November 9, 2026: You can start on the Tray AI Orchestration Platform for $50 a month with Tray Helix Builder Edition.

    Tray.ai is for companies where n8n has spread across departments and IT now needs to govern it. Tray positions itself as a governed runtime: teams build integrations and apps, including ones written with AI coding assistants, and Helix takes them to production with managed credentials, a managed runtime and an owner for every app. You can start on the Tray AI Orchestration Platform for $50 a month with Tray Helix Builder Edition, and a free trial lets you measure usage before you commit. Billing is based on Tasks and Helix Compute Units, with no per-user or per-connection fees, and annual plans are settled with a true-up for usage above the plan. Enterprise adds unlimited workspaces, regional hosting, log streaming and on-premise connectivity. For a single team moving off n8n, the usage units and the governance focus are more than most will need, and there is no self-hosted edition.

    What it does well

    • +Entry price of $50 a month with Helix Builder Edition
    • +No per-user or per-connection fees
    • +Free trial to measure real usage before buying

    Where it falls short

    • −Pricing on Tasks and Helix Compute Units is harder to predict
    • −Built for IT governance more than quick team automations
    • −No self-hosted edition
    Entry price
    $50 a month
    Billing unit
    Tasks and Helix Compute Units
    User fees
    None per user or per connection
    Free trial
    Yes
    Enterprise
    Unlimited workspaces

    Visit tray.ai|Read the full Tray.ai profile

Before you pick a product or a plan

Read the license before you self-host

n8n's Sustainable Use License allows internal business, personal and non-commercial use, and limits distribution to free, non-commercial cases. If you want to embed automation in a product you sell, look at Activepieces (MIT), Kestra (Apache 2.0) or Windmill (AGPLv3 and Apache 2.0), and check each project's terms with your legal team.

Convert executions into the new billing unit

n8n counts one execution per full workflow run. Activepieces also counts 1 credit per run, Make and Zapier count each action or task, Latenode counts CPU seconds, and Windmill, Kestra and Power Automate price seats, workers, instances or bots. Take your monthly execution count and average steps per workflow, then model both on each shortlist vendor.

Decide who builds the workflows

Windmill and Kestra are code-first and suit engineers who want Git review and environment promotion. Make, Zapier and Gumloop are friendlier for business users. Activepieces and Latenode sit between the two, with visual builders that still accept code.

Price the hosting work honestly

Self-hosting removes per-run fees but adds servers, upgrades, backups and on-call time. If your n8n server is a burden, a hosted plan may cost less overall even at a higher sticker price. If data has to stay on your network, stick with the self-hostable tools.

Rebuild your hardest workflow first

Pick the n8n workflow with the most branches, code nodes or AI steps and rebuild it on the free tier or trial of your top two choices. Confirm every trigger and app exists before you migrate the rest.

Questions readers ask

What is the best n8n alternative in 2026?
Activepieces ranks first on our list. Its Community Edition is MIT licensed and self-hostable, a run costs 1 credit however many steps it has, and Plus is $20 flat per month. Make is second for teams that want a hosted visual builder.
Is there an open-source alternative to n8n?
Yes. Activepieces is released under the MIT license, Kestra under Apache 2.0, and Windmill under AGPLv3 and Apache 2.0. All three can run on your own servers, and Windmill and Kestra list unlimited executions on their free editions.
Why do teams move away from n8n?
Common reasons are the Sustainable Use License, which limits use to internal business, personal or non-commercial purposes, cloud plans billed per workflow execution, and the upkeep of a self-hosted server. Which alternative fits depends on which of those is the problem.
Which n8n alternative is cheapest?
Latenode has no base fee, gives 10,000 CPU seconds free each month and lists 100,000 short workflows a month at $10.80. Power Automate Premium is $15 per user per month billed annually, Zapier Professional starts at $19.99 a month and Activepieces Plus is $20 flat per month. The self-hosted editions of Windmill and Kestra are free.
Is Zapier or Make a better n8n alternative?
Make scores higher on our list because its router and error handler modules cost no credits and its canvas handles branching well. Zapier has more apps, 9,000+, and is easier for non-technical staff, but both bill per action or task, which costs more than n8n on long workflows.

Spotted an error or a price change? Write to editorial@dbotmaker.io

Nobody paid to appear here and none of the links earn us money. Details are in our editorial policy. Makers change prices, plans and terms often, so check the price on their site before you buy or upgrade.

More rankings