10 Best AI Agent Frameworks of 2026
By the DBotMaker research desk · Updated November 6, 2026 · Next review December 21, 2026 · 10 products compared
Spec sheet
Vendor-documented specs. Click a column to sort.
| Product | Free plan or trial | Setup | License | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LangGraph | 8.8 | $39 | Free plan | Python, TypeScript | Any model provider | Both | MIT |
| 2 | Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) | 8.7 | Free | Free plan | Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, Kotlin | Gemini, Claude, OpenAI, Ollama, vLLM, LiteLLM | Self-serve | Apache 2.0 |
| 3 | OpenAI Agents SDK | 8.7 | Free | Free plan | Python, TypeScript | OpenAI plus LiteLLM and Any-LLM adapters | Self-serve | MIT |
| 4 | CrewAI | 8.6 | Free | Free plan | Python | Hundreds of open source tools, MCP | Both | MIT |
| 5 | Pydantic AI | 8.6 | $49 | Free plan | Python | Any model provider, swap by string | Self-serve | MIT |
| 6 | Microsoft Agent Framework | 8.5 | Free | Free plan | .NET, Python, Go (preview) | Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Ollama and more | Self-serve | MIT |
| 7 | Mastra | 8.4 | $250 | Free plan | TypeScript | 40+ model providers | Both | Apache 2.0 |
| 8 | Agno | 8.3 | $150 | Free plan | Python, REST API, MCP, Slack and Discord | Agno, Claude Agent and Codex SDKs, LangGraph | Both | Apache 2.0 |
| 9 | Letta | 7.9 | $20 | Free plan | TypeScript, CLI, Slack, Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp, Signal | Bring your own API keys, MCP | Both | Apache 2.0 |
| 10 | LlamaIndex | 7.9 | $500 | Free plan | Python | Not published | Both | MIT |
The short version
LangGraph is the framework to pick when an agent has to run for a long time, pause for human approval and resume from saved state; its low-level graph model takes longer to learn, but it gives the most control, and LangSmith adds tracing and deployment from $39 per seat. The OpenAI Agents SDK is the quickest start, with handoffs, guardrails, sessions and sandbox agents behind a small set of primitives. Google ADK is the widest multi-language option, covering Python, TypeScript, Go, Java and Kotlin. Pydantic AI suits Python teams that care about typed outputs and model fallbacks, and CrewAI is the simplest way to model a team of role-based agents. Microsoft Agent Framework is the natural choice on .NET and Azure, Mastra is the TypeScript pick, Agno pairs a framework with a self-hosted control plane, LlamaIndex is strongest when agents work over documents, and Letta focuses on agents with long-term memory.
Short answer
LangGraph is the best AI agent framework for teams that need fine-grained control over long-running, stateful agents in 2026; the OpenAI Agents SDK suits developers who want the fewest abstractions and a short path to a working agent. Every framework on this list is free and open source, and the cheapest verified paid add-on is Letta Pro at $20 a month.
This list is for developers and engineering teams picking a code framework to build AI agents: programs that call a model in a loop, use tools, keep state and hand work between agents. It does not cover no-code agent builders. All ten frameworks are free to use under open source licenses; what you pay for is model usage and, if you want it, the vendor's hosted platform for tracing, deployment or a control plane. We compared documented features, languages, licenses and published prices on each vendor's own pages and docs, and scored capabilities at 40%, ease of setup at 30% and value at 30%. Starting prices are the cheapest paid tier of the vendor's companion platform in USD.
Figures worth knowing
- 62%62% of large US organizations surveyed by KPMG in the third quarter of 2026 were building, testing or deploying AI agents, up from 53% one quarter earlier.Source: KPMG
- 2%Only 2% of large organizations surveyed by Capgemini Research Institute in April 2025 had fully scaled their deployment of AI agents.Source: Capgemini Research Institute
- $207 millionUS organizations in KPMG's Q1 2026 AI Pulse projected average AI spending of $207 million over the next 12 months, nearly double the level a year earlier.Source: KPMG
- 66%AI agents rose from 12% to about 66% task success on OSWorld, a benchmark of real computer tasks, but still fail roughly 1 in 3 attempts, according to the Stanford AI Index 2026.Source: Stanford HAI
- 95%95% of about 900 software engineers surveyed by The Pragmatic Engineer in early 2026 used AI tools at least weekly, and 75% used AI for at least half of their engineering work.Source: The Pragmatic Engineer
The ranking at a glance
- 1LangGraphEngineering teams building production agents that must pause for approval, keep memory across sessions and follow controlled multi-agent flows.8.8
- 2Google Agent Development Kit (ADK)Teams on Google Cloud or with mixed-language stacks that want one framework across Python, TypeScript, Go, Java and Kotlin.8.7
- 3OpenAI Agents SDKDevelopers who want a working agent quickly with few abstractions, especially on OpenAI models.8.7
- 4CrewAIPython teams that think in terms of a crew of specialist agents and want a visual editor alongside code.8.6
- 5Pydantic AIPython developers who want type-safe agents, structured outputs and easy switching between model providers.8.6
- 6Microsoft Agent Framework.NET shops and Azure customers that want enterprise features such as typed state, middleware and telemetry.8.5
- 7MastraTypeScript and Node.js teams that want agents, durable workflows and hosting from one vendor.8.4
- 8AgnoTeams that want to run agents as durable services in their own cloud and keep all data in-house.8.3
- 9LettaDevelopers building agents that must remember users and improve with use over weeks or months.7.9
- 10LlamaIndexTeams building agents that answer questions or act on large sets of PDFs, slide decks and other documents.7.9
How we make the call
Every entry gets a 0 to 10 rating on the three criteria below, and the order follows the weighted total. The ratings rest on the documented features and published prices on each maker's own pages, never hands-on testing.
- 40%Capabilities
- 30%Ease of setup
- 30%Value
No. 1, top ranked
LangGraphLangChain's open source agent runtime and low-level orchestration framework for stateful, long-running agents, with LangSmith as the paid platform for tracing, evaluation and deployment.
8.8of 10Best for Engineering teams building production agents that must pause for approval, keep memory across sessions and follow controlled multi-agent flows.
- Capabilities
- 9.5
- Ease of setup
- 7.8
- Value
- 8.8
Price
Framework free (MIT); LangSmith Developer free for 1 seat; Plus $39 per seat per month plus usage
Quoted from the LangGraph pricing page on November 6, 2026:
$39 / seat per month then pay as you go
LangGraph ranks first because it gives developers direct control over how an agent moves between steps, which is what long-running production agents need. LangChain describes it as an agent runtime and low-level orchestration framework: you define state and the paths between nodes, then add human-in-the-loop checks that pause the agent for approval, built-in memory that persists across sessions, and token-by-token streaming of reasoning and actions. The same framework covers single agents, multi-agent teams and hierarchical setups. The library is MIT licensed and works with any model provider. The paid side is LangSmith: the Developer plan is free for one seat with 5k base traces a month, and Plus costs $39 per seat a month with 10k traces and one free small serverless deployment. The trade-off is effort. The graph model asks more of you up front than the OpenAI Agents SDK or CrewAI, and metered usage on LangSmith needs watching.
What it does well
- +The most control over state and flow of any framework here
- +LangSmith Developer plan is free with 5k base traces a month
- +Plus includes one free Serverless (Small) deployment
Where it falls short
- −Graph-based design takes longer to learn than higher-level SDKs
- −LangSmith usage beyond included traces is metered in LangChain Standard Units
- −Self-hosted and hybrid LangSmith need the Enterprise plan
- License
- MIT
- LangSmith Developer
- $0, 1 seat, 5k base traces a month
- LangSmith Plus
- $39 per seat per month, 10k base traces a month
- Startup credits
- Up to $10,000 for VC-backed startups
No. 2
Google Agent Development Kit (ADK)Google's open source agent development framework for building, debugging and deploying agents, available in five languages.
8.7of 10Best for Teams on Google Cloud or with mixed-language stacks that want one framework across Python, TypeScript, Go, Java and Kotlin.
- Capabilities
- 8.9
- Ease of setup
- 8.2
- Value
- 8.8
Price
Free and open source (Apache 2.0); you pay for models and hosting
Quoted from the Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) pricing page on November 6, 2026:
ADK is the open-source agent development framework that lets you build, debug, and deploy reliable AI agents at enterprise scale.
Google's Agent Development Kit is the most complete option for teams that do not live in a single language. The docs cover Python, TypeScript, Go, Java and Kotlin, and ADK 2.0 adds graph workflows next to the existing sequential, loop and parallel templates. Agents can delegate to sub-agents, call function, MCP and OpenAPI tools, and talk to remote agents through the A2A protocol. ADK also handles live and voice agents, and ships a web interface, a visual builder, a CLI and an API server for running and testing them. Evaluation features include criteria, user simulation and custom metrics. Model support goes beyond Gemini to Claude, OpenAI, Ollama, vLLM and LiteLLM. The framework is Apache 2.0 licensed and free. Its deployment guides point to Google's Agent Runtime, Cloud Run and GKE, which suits Google Cloud teams but means extra work elsewhere, and the sheer number of features makes the first week steeper than with the OpenAI SDK.
What it does well
- +The widest language coverage on this list
- +Built-in evaluation, user simulation and observability docs
- +Works with non-Google models including Claude and OpenAI
Where it falls short
- −Managed deployment paths center on Google Cloud
- −Feature parity varies across the five language SDKs
- −Large surface area to learn compared with smaller SDKs
- License
- Apache 2.0
- Languages
- Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, Kotlin
- Latest major
- ADK 2.0, TypeScript 2.0 GA with graph workflows
- Install (Python)
- pip install google-adk
Visit google.github.io|Read the full Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) profile
No. 3
OpenAI Agents SDKOpenAI's open source SDK for building agents from a small set of primitives: agents with tools, handoffs between agents, guardrails and sessions.
8.7of 10Best for Developers who want a working agent quickly with few abstractions, especially on OpenAI models.
- Capabilities
- 8.6
- Ease of setup
- 9.0
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Free and open source (MIT); you pay for model usage
Quoted from the OpenAI Agents SDK pricing page on November 6, 2026:
We're committed to continuing to build the Agents SDK as an open source framework so others in the community can expand on our approach.
The OpenAI Agents SDK is the fastest route from idea to working agent. OpenAI built it around very few primitives: agents with instructions and tools, handoffs or agents-as-tools for delegation, and guardrails that validate inputs and outputs in parallel with the run. On top of that come sessions for persistent memory, human-in-the-loop hooks, MCP tool calling and built-in tracing that connects to OpenAI's evaluation and fine-tuning tools. Newer additions include sandbox agents that work inside isolated, resumable workspaces, and realtime voice agents. The SDK is MIT licensed, available for Python and TypeScript, and replaces OpenAI's earlier Swarm experiment. It uses the Responses API by default, and other providers plug in through LiteLLM or Any-LLM adapters, so it is not locked to OpenAI, but it is clearly tuned for it. There is no hosted deployment layer, so you run agents on your own infrastructure.
What it does well
- +A first agent takes a few lines of Python
- +Guardrails run in parallel with the agent and fail fast
- +Function tools get automatic schemas with Pydantic validation
Where it falls short
- −Defaults to the OpenAI Responses API, so other models need an adapter
- −No hosted deployment product of its own
- −Fewer explicit workflow controls than LangGraph or Microsoft Agent Framework
- License
- MIT
- Install
- pip install openai-agents
- Predecessor
- Swarm
- MCP
- Built-in MCP server tool calling
No. 4
CrewAIAn open source multi-agent framework where you describe each agent's role, goal and backstory, plus a hosted platform with a visual editor.
8.6of 10Best for Python teams that think in terms of a crew of specialist agents and want a visual editor alongside code.
- Capabilities
- 8.8
- Ease of setup
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.2
Price
Framework free (MIT); hosted Basic plan free with 50 workflow executions a month; Enterprise custom
Quoted from the CrewAI pricing page on November 6, 2026:
50 workflow executions/month
CrewAI is the easiest framework to explain to the rest of the business. You describe each agent's role, goal and backstory, assign tasks and group the agents into a crew, in YAML, code or both. Under that simple surface are planning agents that recover from errors, hundreds of open source tools, MCP support, sandboxed code execution through E2B and Daytona, a memory layer that resolves contradictions, and checkpointing that lets you replay or fork a run from any step. Flows add explicit orchestration and state when crews need structure. The framework is MIT licensed. The hosted platform has a free Basic plan with the Studio visual editor, an AI copilot, tracing, OpenTelemetry, guardrails and 50 workflow executions a month. Beyond that, the only option is a custom Enterprise plan with SSO, RBAC, VPC deployment and a 45-day onboarding, so small teams that outgrow Basic have no self-serve step up.
What it does well
- +Role-based setup is easy to read and explain to non-engineers
- +Free hosted plan includes a visual editor, AI copilot and tracing
- +OpenTelemetry, guardrails and human-in-the-loop input on the free plan
Where it falls short
- −No self-serve paid tier between Basic and Enterprise
- −Basic allows only 50 workflow executions a month
- −SSO and RBAC are Enterprise only
- License
- MIT
- Basic plan
- Free, 2 agentic workflow automations, 50 executions a month
- Enterprise
- Custom, CrewAI cloud, your VPC or your own infrastructure
- Enterprise onboarding
- 45 days
No. 5
Pydantic AIThe Pydantic team's typed Python agent framework, with model fallbacks, a harness of add-on capabilities and Logfire as the paid observability platform.
8.6of 10Best for Python developers who want type-safe agents, structured outputs and easy switching between model providers.
- Capabilities
- 8.6
- Ease of setup
- 8.4
- Value
- 8.9
Price
Framework free (MIT); Logfire Personal free; Team $49 per month
Quoted from the Pydantic AI pricing page on November 6, 2026:
Team $49/mo For small teams shipping their first production workloads.
Pydantic AI comes from the team behind the Pydantic validation library, and its focus on types shows. You define an agent with a model string, tools and an output type, and the framework validates what comes back, falling back to another model when a provider fails. The Pydantic AI Harness adds capabilities you snap on as needed, from memory, guardrails and sub-agents to planning and context management, and even ships a complete terminal coding agent built from those parts. Pydantic Evals grades final outputs and tool-call paths, and Pydantic Graph adds typed control flow when one loop is not enough. Instrumentation is plain OpenTelemetry, so traces go to Logfire or any backend you already run. Logfire's Personal plan is free with 10M records a month, and Team costs $49 a month with five seats. The framework is Python only, and the split into several packages means a little more assembly than an all-in-one SDK.
What it does well
- +Strong typing catches output errors before they reach users
- +Logfire Personal is free with 10M records a month
- +Agents run in web apps, terminals, voice calls or durable queues
Where it falls short
- −Python only
- −Some capabilities live in separate packages you install and combine
- −No hosted agent runtime from the vendor
- License
- MIT
- Logfire Personal
- Free, 10M records a month, 1 seat
- Logfire Team
- $49 a month, 10M records, 5 seats
- Extra records on Team
- $2 per million
No. 6
Microsoft Agent FrameworkMicrosoft's open source successor to AutoGen and Semantic Kernel for building agents and graph-based multi-agent workflows in .NET and Python.
8.5of 10Best for .NET shops and Azure customers that want enterprise features such as typed state, middleware and telemetry.
- Capabilities
- 8.9
- Ease of setup
- 7.7
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Free and open source (MIT); you pay for models and Azure services
Quoted from the Microsoft Agent Framework pricing page on November 6, 2026:
Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) is an open, multi-language framework for building production-grade AI agents and multi-agent workflows in .NET and Python
Microsoft Agent Framework is the direct successor to AutoGen and Semantic Kernel, built by the same teams. It keeps AutoGen's simple single and multi-agent abstractions and adds Semantic Kernel's enterprise pieces: session-based state, type safety, middleware, filters and telemetry. The framework has four parts. Agents call tools and MCP servers on Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Ollama and other providers. The Harness Agent adds planning, todo tracking, context compaction, file access, memory and tool approval for long tasks. Workflows connect agents and functions through functional or graph-based paths, and integrations cover model providers, evaluation services and UI frameworks. It is MIT licensed and supports .NET and Python, with Go in public preview without declarative agents or workflows. Microsoft's own advice is to use a workflow when the steps are known and an agent only when the task is open-ended. Examples assume Azure credentials, so non-Azure teams have more setup.
What it does well
- +First-class .NET support, rare among agent frameworks
- +Combines AutoGen's abstractions with Semantic Kernel's enterprise features
- +Built-in tool approval in the Harness Agent
Where it falls short
- −Go version is in public preview with missing features
- −Quickstarts lean on Azure and Microsoft Foundry
- −Teams on AutoGen or Semantic Kernel face a migration
- License
- MIT
- Languages
- .NET, Python, Go in public preview
- Replaces
- AutoGen and Semantic Kernel
- Install (Python)
- pip install agent-framework
Visit microsoft.com|Read the full Microsoft Agent Framework profile
No. 7
MastraA TypeScript framework for agents, workflows and memory, with a hosted Mastra Platform for deployment and observability.
8.4of 10Best for TypeScript and Node.js teams that want agents, durable workflows and hosting from one vendor.
- Capabilities
- 8.7
- Ease of setup
- 8.5
- Value
- 8.0
Price
Framework free (Apache 2.0); Platform Starter free; Teams $250 per month
Quoted from the Mastra pricing page on November 6, 2026:
Teams For growing teams $250 / month
Mastra is the strongest pick for teams that write TypeScript. The open source framework, licensed under Apache 2.0, covers agents with models, tools, memory and instructions, durable workflows with typed control flow, and observational memory that keeps context across sessions. A model router connects to 40+ providers through one interface, using simple provider/model strings. The hosted Mastra Platform adds observability, deployments and Studio. Its free Starter tier includes 100K observability events, 24 CPU hours and 15 days of retention with unlimited users and projects, which is generous for testing. The step up is steep: Teams costs $250 a month for 1M events, 250 CPU hours, six months of retention, SSO and SOC 2 documents, and extras such as a 24/7 persistent server cost $100 per project. Enterprise features for self-hosting, including RBAC and SSO, sit under a separate commercial license. Python teams should look elsewhere.
What it does well
- +Built for TypeScript from the start
- +Starter plan includes 100K observability events and 24 CPU hours free
- +Unlimited users, deployments and projects on Starter
Where it falls short
- −No Python version
- −The first paid tier jumps to $250 a month
- −Some self-hosted enterprise features need a separate license
- License
- Apache 2.0 framework, enterprise license for some self-hosted features
- Starter
- $0, 100K events, 24 CPU hours, 15-day retention
- Teams
- $250 a month, 1M events, 250 CPU hours, 6-month retention
- Gateway tokens
- Market rate plus 5.5%
No. 8
AgnoAn open source Python agent SDK and AgentOS runtime you host in your own cloud, with a paid control plane for live deployments.
8.3of 10Best for Teams that want to run agents as durable services in their own cloud and keep all data in-house.
- Capabilities
- 8.5
- Ease of setup
- 8.2
- Value
- 8.0
Price
SDK and runtime free (Apache 2.0); Pro control plane $150 per month with 3 seats; 14-day trial
Quoted from the Agno pricing page on November 6, 2026:
Pro $150/month Everything in Free
Agno takes a different approach from most frameworks: instead of hosting your agents, it gives you a runtime called AgentOS to run in your own cloud, with templates for Render, Railway, Docker, AWS, Fly, GCP, Kubernetes, Azure and Modal. AgentOS handles authentication, role-based access, resume and replay, human approvals, scheduling and durable execution, and serves agents over a REST API, an MCP server for Claude and ChatGPT, and chat apps such as Slack and Discord. You can build with the Agno SDK or plug in the Claude Agent SDK, Codex SDK or LangGraph. The runtime is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and Agno says it never meters events, compute or storage. The paid part is the control plane for live deployments: Pro costs $150 a month with one live connection and three seats, after a 14-day trial. Extra connections at $95 each and SAML SSO at $300 a month add up for larger rollouts.
What it does well
- +Data stays in your cloud and Agno holds no copy
- +No per-event, compute, storage or egress fees on any plan
- +Control plane also works with LangGraph and Claude Code
Where it falls short
- −Free plan's control plane works only with a local AgentOS
- −Pro's $150 a month covers one live connection, extra ones cost $95
- −SAML SSO is a $300 a month add-on
- License
- Apache 2.0
- Free
- $0, unlimited usage, local control plane
- Pro
- $150 a month, 1 live AgentOS connection, 3 seats
- Extra seat
- $30 a month
No. 9
LettaAn open source platform for stateful agents with long-term memory, offered as an agent SDK, a CLI, a self-hosted server and Letta Cloud.
7.9of 10Best for Developers building agents that must remember users and improve with use over weeks or months.
- Capabilities
- 8.0
- Ease of setup
- 7.8
- Value
- 7.8
Price
Free plan with your own API keys; Pro $20 per month; API plan $20 per month plus usage
Quoted from the Letta pricing page on November 6, 2026:
Pro For personal use. $20 /month
Letta is built around one idea: agents should keep long-term memory and get better with use. Its open source agent harness, licensed under Apache 2.0, stores memory in repositories the agent reads and edits, supports shared memory between agents, and adds skills, schedules and subagents for recurring work. Developers embed agents through the Letta Agent SDK for TypeScript applications, then choose managed Letta Cloud or run the full runtime themselves with the Letta App Server. Agents can also live in Slack, Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp and Signal through channels. Pricing is the cheapest verified paid entry here: Pro is $20 a month with up to 20 stateful agents and a Letta Auto quota, and the API plan for developers is $20 a month with unlimited agents, $0.10 per active agent and per-second tool execution fees. The free plan caps you at 3 stateful agents. Recent releases lean toward coding and personal assistants, so general app builders should check the SDK docs closely.
What it does well
- +Memory is the core design rather than an add-on
- +Free plan works with your own keys and existing coding plans
- +Lowest verified paid entry price on this list
Where it falls short
- −Free plan is limited to 3 stateful agents
- −API plan adds $0.10 per active agent a month plus tool execution fees
- −Product focus has shifted toward coding and personal agents
- License
- Apache 2.0
- Free
- $0, limited agents, bring your own keys
- Pro
- $20 a month, up to 20 stateful agents
- API plan
- $20 a month, unlimited agents, $0.10 per active agent
No. 10
LlamaIndexAn open source Python toolkit for agents and retrieval over your own data, paired with the paid LlamaParse document platform.
7.9of 10Best for Teams building agents that answer questions or act on large sets of PDFs, slide decks and other documents.
- Capabilities
- 8.3
- Ease of setup
- 7.8
- Value
- 7.6
Price
Framework free (MIT); LlamaParse pay-as-you-go from $0 with 10K free credits; Pro $500 per month
Quoted from the LlamaIndex pricing page on November 6, 2026:
Pro $500 /month
LlamaIndex built its name on retrieval-augmented generation, and its framework remains the best option when an agent's main job is working over your documents. The MIT-licensed Python toolkit gives you ingestion pipelines, node parsers, vector store integrations and query engines, and treats a RAG pipeline as one tool an agent can call. Agent Workflows are event-driven, multi-step processes with branching, retries, concurrency, streaming and human-in-the-loop review, and can run as durable services. The company now leads with LlamaParse, its paid parsing and extraction platform for 130+ file formats. Pay-as-you-go costs $0 a month with 10K free credits and then $1.5 per 1,000 credits, while Pro is $500 a month with cheaper credits and a one-time credit bonus for business email domains. For agents that rarely touch documents, the framework's strengths matter less and lighter SDKs are easier to start with.
What it does well
- +The shortest path from parsed documents to an agent that uses them
- +LlamaParse includes 10K free credits on pay-as-you-go
- +Large library of vector store and data connectors
Where it falls short
- −Framework is now positioned behind LlamaParse in the company's own messaging
- −LlamaParse Pro starts at $500 a month
- −Less suited to agents that do not work over documents
- License
- MIT
- LlamaParse pay-as-you-go
- $0 a month, 10K free credits, $1.5 per 1K credits
- LlamaParse Pro
- $500 a month, $1.25 per 1K credits
- File types
- 130+ formats
Before you pick a product or a plan
Start from your language
Mastra is TypeScript only, while Pydantic AI, CrewAI, Agno and LlamaIndex are Python frameworks. LangGraph and the OpenAI Agents SDK ship Python and TypeScript versions, Microsoft Agent Framework covers .NET and Python with Go in public preview, and Google ADK is available in Python, TypeScript, Go, Java and Kotlin. Picking a framework in the language your team already ships saves more time than any feature difference.
Decide how much control you need
LangGraph and Microsoft Agent Framework model agents as explicit graphs or workflows, which suits regulated or long-running processes where every step must be predictable. The OpenAI Agents SDK, Pydantic AI and CrewAI hide more of the loop and get a first agent running in a few lines. Most teams start simple and move work into explicit workflows only where they need it.
Check model lock-in
Several frameworks come from model vendors. The OpenAI Agents SDK defaults to the Responses API but supports other providers through LiteLLM and Any-LLM adapters, Google ADK lists Gemini, Claude, OpenAI, Ollama and vLLM, and Microsoft Agent Framework supports Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI and Ollama. Mastra routes to 40+ providers through one interface.
Budget for the platform, not the library
The libraries are free. Costs come from model tokens and from optional hosted tools: LangSmith Plus is $39 per seat a month, Pydantic Logfire Team is $49 a month, Agno Pro is $150 a month, Mastra Teams is $250 a month and LlamaParse Pro is $500 a month. Each of these also has a free tier, so you can trace and test before paying.
Plan for observability early
Agents fail in ways that are hard to reproduce, so tracing matters from day one. The OpenAI Agents SDK has built-in tracing, CrewAI supports OpenTelemetry, Pydantic AI instruments with plain OpenTelemetry, and LangSmith traces LangGraph runs. Choose a framework whose traces you can export to the tools you already use.
Questions readers ask
- What is the best AI agent framework in 2026?
- LangGraph ranks first on our list for teams that need controlled, stateful agents with human approval steps, and its LangSmith platform is free for one seat. The OpenAI Agents SDK is second for developers who want the quickest start with handoffs, guardrails and built-in tracing.
- Are AI agent frameworks free?
- Yes. All ten frameworks on this list are open source under the MIT or Apache 2.0 license. You pay for model usage and, optionally, for the vendor's hosted platform, such as LangSmith Plus at $39 per seat a month or Pydantic Logfire Team at $49 a month.
- Which agent framework is best for TypeScript?
- Mastra is built for TypeScript and includes agents, durable workflows, memory and routing to 40+ model providers. LangGraph, the OpenAI Agents SDK and Google ADK also ship TypeScript versions.
- Which framework should .NET or Java teams use?
- Microsoft Agent Framework supports .NET and Python, with Go in public preview, and replaces AutoGen and Semantic Kernel. Google ADK covers Java and Kotlin as well as Python, TypeScript and Go.
- Do I need a framework to build an AI agent?
- No. OpenAI notes that you can call the Responses API directly when you want to own the loop and state yourself. A framework helps once you need tool execution, handoffs, memory, guardrails or tracing across many steps.
Spotted an error or a price change? Write to editorial@dbotmaker.io
Nobody paid to appear here and none of the links earn us money. Details are in our editorial policy. Makers change prices, plans and terms often, so check the price on their site before you buy or upgrade.