10 Best Workflow Orchestration Tools of 2026
By the DBotMaker research desk · Updated November 9, 2026 · Next review December 24, 2026 · 10 products compared
Spec sheet
Vendor-documented specs. Click a column to sort.
| Product | Free plan or trial | Setup | Free tier | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Temporal | 8.8 | Custom | No | Go, Java, Python, TypeScript, .NET, Ruby, PHP | Not published | Both | $150 in credits for 90 days |
| 2 | Inngest | 8.7 | $99 | Free plan | TypeScript, Python, Go, Kotlin | Not published | Both | 50k executions a month |
| 3 | Trigger.dev | 8.7 | $10 | Free plan | TypeScript, Python, Bun | Not published | Both | $5 a month in compute credits |
| 4 | Hatchet | 8.6 | Free | Free plan | TypeScript, Python, Go | Not published | Both | 1M task runs and 1M events a month |
| 5 | Restate | 8.5 | $75 | Free plan | TypeScript, Python, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust, Ruby | Vercel, AWS Lambda, Cloudflare, Cloud Run and more | Both | 100k actions |
| 6 | Prefect | 8.4 | $100 | Free plan | Python | Not published | Both | Hobby: 2 users, 5 deployments |
| 7 | Dagster | 8.3 | $10 | 30-day trial | Serverless, Hybrid: ECS, Kubernetes, Docker, Azure | Native dbt, Snowflake and Fivetran | Both | 30-day free trial |
| 8 | Windmill | 8.3 | $120 | Free plan | TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust, Bash, SQL, PHP | Not published | Both | Open source edition, unlimited executions |
| 9 | AWS Step Functions | 8.1 | Free | Free plan | AWS | 220 AWS services and over 10,000 APIs | Self-serve | 4,000 state transitions a month |
| 10 | Astronomer | 7.9 | $0.35 | No | AWS, Azure, GCP | Airflow providers, native dbt | Both | Free trial |
The short version
Temporal is the default pick when workflows must run for days or months and never lose progress: it has native SDKs in seven languages, a self-hosted open source server and a pay-as-you-go cloud from $50 per million actions with no base fee. Inngest and Trigger.dev are the faster start for TypeScript teams, with step functions, queues and AI agent support behind a single SDK, and Trigger.dev Hobby costs $10 a month. Hatchet is the value pick, with 1M free task runs a month and $30 per million after that. Restate covers the widest set of languages after Temporal. For data pipelines, Prefect turns Python functions into flows with one decorator, Dagster models pipelines as assets and is now part of Prefect, and Astronomer runs managed Apache Airflow. Windmill suits teams that want scripts, flows and internal apps on one self-hostable platform, and AWS Step Functions is the natural choice for workloads already on AWS.
Short answer
Temporal is the best workflow orchestration tool for engineering teams that need durable, long-running workflows in 2026; Inngest suits TypeScript and Python teams that want event-driven background jobs and agent steps with no infrastructure to run. Hatchet gives the most free usage, with 1M task runs a month at no cost, and Trigger.dev Hobby is the cheapest paid plan at $10 a month.
This list is for developers who run durable background jobs, AI agent loops and data pipelines as code, and need retries, queues, schedules and state that survive crashes and deploys. It covers durable execution engines (Temporal, Inngest, Trigger.dev, Hatchet, Restate), data orchestrators (Prefect, Dagster, Astronomer for Apache Airflow), a code-first script and flow platform (Windmill) and a managed cloud service (AWS Step Functions). It does not cover no-code automation tools. We compared documented features, SDK languages, free tiers and published prices on each vendor's own pages, and scored capabilities at 40%, ease of setup at 30% and value at 30%. Most of these tools are open source and can be self-hosted; prices below are for the vendor's managed cloud in USD.
Figures worth knowing
- 55.03%55.03% of large EU enterprises used AI in 2025, compared with 30.36% of medium-sized and 17% of small enterprises.Source: Eurostat
- 19.8%19.8% of US businesses reported using AI in a business function in the Census survey period ending May 3, 2026.Source: U.S. Census Bureau
- 48%Large organizations surveyed by Camunda had automated 48% of their processes on average in 2025 and believed this could reach 64%.Source: Camunda
- 5.4%US workers who used generative AI in the previous week saved an average of 5.4% of their work hours in November 2024, according to the Real-Time Population Survey.Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 62%62% of large US organizations surveyed by KPMG in the third quarter of 2026 were building, testing or deploying AI agents, up from 53% one quarter earlier.Source: KPMG
The ranking at a glance
- 1TemporalEngineering teams running business-critical, long-running workflows such as payments, order fulfillment, infrastructure deploys and AI agents.8.8
- 2InngestTypeScript and Python teams that want durable steps, flow control and tracing on top of serverless or existing apps with no queue infrastructure.8.7
- 3Trigger.devTypeScript teams building AI agents, media processing and long-running tasks that need retries, queues and realtime updates in the frontend.8.7
- 4HatchetTeams that run high volumes of background tasks in TypeScript, Python or Go and want low per-run prices with no plan fees.8.6
- 5RestatePolyglot teams that want durable services and agent loops across many languages and serverless platforms.8.5
- 6PrefectPython data and ML teams that want to turn existing functions into scheduled, observable workflows with little new code.8.4
- 7DagsterData platform teams that model pipelines as data assets and work heavily with dbt, Snowflake and Fivetran.8.3
- 8WindmillEngineering and platform teams that want scripts, flows and internal tools on one self-hosted platform.8.3
- 9AWS Step FunctionsTeams already on AWS that want to coordinate Lambda functions and other AWS services without running an orchestrator.8.1
- 10AstronomerData teams that already run Apache Airflow DAGs and want a managed service with scale-to-zero workers and lineage.7.9
How we make the call
Every entry gets a 0 to 10 rating on the three criteria below, and the order follows the weighted total. The ratings rest on the documented features and published prices on each maker's own pages, never hands-on testing.
- 40%Capabilities
- 30%Ease of setup
- 30%Value
No. 1, top ranked
TemporalAn open source durable execution platform that lets developers write workflows as code, with Temporal Cloud as the fully managed service.
8.8of 10Best for Engineering teams running business-critical, long-running workflows such as payments, order fulfillment, infrastructure deploys and AI agents.
- Capabilities
- 9.6
- Ease of setup
- 7.8
- Value
- 8.8
Price
Pay as you go from $50 per million actions with no base monthly fee; $150 in free credits for 90 days
Quoted from the Temporal pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Starting at $50 per million actions
Temporal ranks first because it handles the hardest case on this list: code that must keep running through crashes, failed APIs and redeploys for weeks at a time. You write business logic as a workflow, and Temporal records its state at every step, so a failed run picks up where it stopped instead of starting over. Failure-prone calls become activities that retry on their own, and the service adds task queues, signals and timers for patterns such as human approval and sagas. Native SDKs cover Go, Java, Python, TypeScript, .NET, Ruby and PHP. The whole platform can be self-hosted as open source, and Temporal Cloud is pay as you go from $50 per million actions with no base fee and $150 in credits for new accounts. The trade-offs are learning time and metering: timers, signals, queries and activity starts all count as actions, and developer support adds 10% of usage.
What it does well
- +Workflows can run for days, weeks or months without losing progress
- +No base monthly fee on Temporal Cloud, and self-serve volume pricing goes down to $25 per million actions
- +The full platform is free to self-host
Where it falls short
- −Developer support on the cloud plan adds 10% of usage
- −Every timer, signal, query and activity start counts as a billable action
- −The workflow and activity model takes more learning than step-function SDKs
- Cloud pricing
- From $50 per million actions, no base fee
- Free credits
- $150 for 90 days
- Business support
- Greater of $500 a month or 10% of usage
- SLA
- 99.9%, with 99.99% high availability options
No. 2
InngestAn open source durable execution SDK and cloud for event-driven background jobs, scheduled jobs and AI workflows.
8.7of 10Best for TypeScript and Python teams that want durable steps, flow control and tracing on top of serverless or existing apps with no queue infrastructure.
- Capabilities
- 9.0
- Ease of setup
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.3
Price
Free plan with 50k executions a month; Pro from $99 a month; Business $499 a month
Quoted from the Inngest pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Base price $0 $99 /mo $499 /mo
Inngest takes second place because it gets developers to durable background work with the least setup. You install one SDK, wrap code in steps, and each step is checkpointed and retried, with pause, fan-out, defer and A/B testing built in. Functions run wherever your app already runs, including serverless platforms, so there is no queue or worker fleet to maintain. Because Inngest executes the functions, every job, agent and event is traced by default, and flow control stops one heavy user from starving others. SDKs exist for TypeScript, Python, Go and Kotlin. The Free plan includes 50k executions and 5 seats with no card, Pro starts at $99 a month with 1M executions, and Business is $499 a month. The limits to watch are that each step counts as an execution, Free runs pause at the quota, and the longest run is 30 days on Free and 90 days on Pro.
What it does well
- +Free plan needs no credit card and includes 5 seats
- +Observability is built in because Inngest executes the functions
- +Runs on serverless platforms without long-lived workers
Where it falls short
- −Free plan runs pause when the monthly quota is reached
- −Each step counts toward executions, so step-heavy functions use quota quickly
- −Maximum run length is 30 days on Free and 90 days on Pro
- Free plan
- 50k executions, 5 concurrent steps, 5 seats
- Pro
- From $99 a month, 1M executions, 15 seats
- Business
- $499 a month, 10M executions, 30 seats
- Pro overage
- $50 per 1M executions
No. 3
Trigger.devAn open source platform for building durable AI agents and long-running background tasks in TypeScript, with managed compute.
8.7of 10Best for TypeScript teams building AI agents, media processing and long-running tasks that need retries, queues and realtime updates in the frontend.
- Capabilities
- 8.7
- Ease of setup
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Free plan with $5 a month in compute credits; Hobby $10 a month; Pro $50 a month, both with matching usage credits
Quoted from the Trigger.dev pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Hobby $10 /month
Trigger.dev ranks third because it bundles the orchestration engine and the compute that runs your tasks, which removes a whole layer of setup. You write tasks in TypeScript, deploy them, and Trigger.dev runs them on managed machines billed per second, with retries, queues, concurrency limits and durable cron schedules that do not time out. Recent work focuses on AI: chat agents that survive refreshes and redeploys, tool calls that pause for human approval while the run stays alive, and realtime streaming to your frontend without extra API routes. Python scripts can run inside tasks. The Free plan includes $5 of compute a month and 20 concurrent runs, Hobby is $10 a month with $10 of credits, and Pro is $50 a month with $50 of credits and 200 concurrent runs. Watch concurrency: extra capacity on Pro costs $10 a month per 50 runs.
What it does well
- +Paid plans include their price back as usage credits
- +Compute is included, so there are no workers to host
- +Apache 2.0 licensed and self-hostable
Where it falls short
- −Free plan stops running tasks once the $5 in credits is used
- −Pro concurrency beyond 200 runs costs $10 a month per 50
- −Python runs inside a TypeScript-first project rather than through a native Python SDK
- Free
- $0, $5 credits, 20 concurrent runs
- Hobby
- $10 a month, $10 credits, 50 concurrent runs
- Pro
- $50 a month, $50 credits, 200+ concurrent runs
- HIPAA BAA
- $500 a month add-on
No. 4
HatchetAn MIT-licensed orchestration engine for background tasks and durable workflows, with a pay-as-you-go cloud.
8.6of 10Best for Teams that run high volumes of background tasks in TypeScript, Python or Go and want low per-run prices with no plan fees.
- Capabilities
- 8.4
- Ease of setup
- 8.4
- Value
- 9.2
Price
1M task runs and 1M events free every month; then $30 per million runs and $5 per million events, no plan fees
Quoted from the Hatchet pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Then $30 per million runs, $5 per million events
Hatchet earns fourth place on value. Its cloud has no plan fees: the first million task runs and million events each month are free, and after that you pay $30 per million runs and $5 per million events, with volume pricing above 100M runs. That makes it the cheapest way on this list to run a large volume of background tasks. The engine is MIT licensed and runs locally with a single CLI command or on Kubernetes, Docker, ECS and Cloud Run. Native SDKs cover TypeScript, Python and Go. Scheduling controls are a strength: priority queues let urgent tasks jump ahead of backfills, and rate limits can be fixed for third-party APIs or set per user. Logs land in Hatchet with full-text search. The gaps are a shorter language list than Temporal or Restate, 7-day run retention on pay-as-you-go, and child tasks that count as separate runs.
What it does well
- +The largest free monthly allowance of any cloud on this list
- +No plan fees, and 50 users are included
- +Fully MIT licensed and self-hostable
Where it falls short
- −Fewer SDK languages than Temporal or Restate
- −A task that spawns another task counts as two runs
- −Run history is kept for 7 days on pay-as-you-go
- Free usage
- 1M task runs and 1M events a month
- Task runs
- $30 per million after the free million
- Events
- $5 per million after the free million
- Compliance
- SOC 2 Type II on every plan
No. 5
RestateAn open source durable execution engine for services, workflows and AI agents, with Restate Cloud as a managed option.
8.5of 10Best for Polyglot teams that want durable services and agent loops across many languages and serverless platforms.
- Capabilities
- 8.7
- Ease of setup
- 8.0
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Free plan with 100k actions; Starter $75 a month with 5M actions; Business $300 a month
Quoted from the Restate pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Starter $75 per month
Restate places fifth as the most language-flexible engine after Temporal. It provides SDKs for TypeScript, Python, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust and Ruby, and services written in different languages share one protocol and can call each other. You write handlers as normal code, and Restate makes each step durable so the code survives failures; Virtual Objects add durable state keyed to an entity. Restate also documents use with agent frameworks such as the OpenAI Agents SDK, Google ADK, Pydantic AI and LangChain, and runs services on serverless platforms like Vercel, AWS Lambda and Cloudflare. The server is open source under a permissive license and free to self-host. Restate Cloud has a Free plan with 100k actions, Starter at $75 a month with 5M actions and Business at $300 a month with 20M. Free is limited to 10 actions per second, and HIPAA and multi-AZ redundancy are paid add-ons.
What it does well
- +Seven SDK languages that can call each other
- +Open source under a permissive license that allows production use
- +Bring Your Own Cloud option for deployment in your VPC
Where it falls short
- −Free plan is capped at 10 actions per second
- −HIPAA BAA and multi-AZ cost extra on cloud plans
- −Starter is aimed at small production workloads only
- Free
- 100k actions
- Starter
- $75 a month, 5M actions
- Business
- $300 a month, 20M actions
- Extra actions
- $25 per million on Starter and Business
No. 6
PrefectAn open source Python workflow orchestration framework for data, ML and agents, with Prefect Cloud for scheduling and visibility.
8.4of 10Best for Python data and ML teams that want to turn existing functions into scheduled, observable workflows with little new code.
- Capabilities
- 8.6
- Ease of setup
- 8.4
- Value
- 8.2
Price
Hobby free forever; Starter $100 a month; Team $100 per user a month
Quoted from the Prefect pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Starter $100 /mo
Prefect is the top data orchestrator on this list because it asks the least of Python developers. You add the @flow decorator to a function and get state tracking, logging and automatic retries; Prefect describes a workflow as ordinary Python with two decorators, which also makes it easy for coding agents to write. Scheduling covers cron, events and backfills, and runs scale to thousands in parallel with global concurrency limits. Your code can run on Prefect Serverless or on your own compute, while the control plane handles scheduling and visibility. The framework is open source under Apache 2.0 and is the same engine Prefect Cloud runs. Hobby is free forever with 2 users and 5 deployments, Starter is $100 a month with 3 users and 20 deployments, and Team is $100 per user a month. Prefect is Python only, and per-user pricing on Team grows quickly.
What it does well
- +Workflows are ordinary Python with two decorators
- +Framework is Apache 2.0 licensed and is the same engine Prefect Cloud runs
- +Free Hobby tier includes 500 minutes of Prefect Serverless
Where it falls short
- −Python only
- −Starter caps deployments at 20 and users at 3
- −Team plan is priced per user, which adds up for larger groups
- Hobby
- Free, 2 users, 5 deployments
- Starter
- $100 a month, 3 users, 20 deployments
- Team
- $100 per user a month, 4 to 8 users
- License
- Apache 2.0
No. 7
DagsterAn asset-based data orchestration platform with a data catalog, data quality checks and cost insights, now part of Prefect.
8.3of 10Best for Data platform teams that model pipelines as data assets and work heavily with dbt, Snowflake and Fivetran.
- Capabilities
- 8.7
- Ease of setup
- 7.7
- Value
- 8.2
Price
Solo $10 a month plus $0.040 per credit; Starter $100 a month plus $0.035 per credit; 30-day free trial
Quoted from the Dagster pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Solo Plan $10 per month
Dagster is the most data-centric tool on this list. Instead of a chain of tasks, you model pipelines as assets, so Dagster knows what each step produces and can show lineage, freshness and failures across your stack. A data catalog, data quality checks and cost insights are part of the platform, and dbt, Snowflake and Fivetran have first-class integrations. Dagster AI uses that context to help diagnose failed runs. You can run on Dagster Serverless at $0.010 per minute or in hybrid mode on ECS, Kubernetes, Docker or Azure with no compute charge. Solo costs $10 a month plus $0.040 per credit for one user, and Starter is $100 a month plus $0.035 per credit for up to three users, each with a 30-day trial. Dagster's site states it is now part of Prefect. It is a data tool first, and credit metering applies to every op and asset materialization.
What it does well
- +Strong lineage and context for data teams
- +Hybrid deployments carry no compute charge
- +Solo plan starts at $10 a month
Where it falls short
- −No permanent free cloud plan, only a 30-day trial
- −Every op or asset materialization counts as a credit
- −Focused on data pipelines rather than application background jobs
- Solo
- $10 a month plus $0.040 per credit, 1 user
- Starter
- $100 a month plus $0.035 per credit, up to 3 users
- Serverless compute
- $0.010 per minute
- Ownership
- Part of Prefect
No. 8
WindmillAn open source, code-first platform for scripts, workflows, internal apps, AI agents and data pipelines, built to self-host.
8.3of 10Best for Engineering and platform teams that want scripts, flows and internal tools on one self-hosted platform.
- Capabilities
- 8.5
- Ease of setup
- 8.0
- Value
- 8.3
Price
Free open source edition with unlimited executions; Enterprise from $120 a month
Quoted from the Windmill pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Enterprise from $ 120 /mo
Windmill ranks seventh as the broadest platform here. It runs scripts in TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust, Bash, SQL, PHP and more, lets you compose them into DAG workflows in a flow editor or in code, and adds a low-code app editor for internal tools on top. Data work is covered too: DuckDB and Python steps on your own buckets, or a dbt project imported as is. Windmill resolves imports and locks dependency versions at each deploy, and git sync commits each deploy to GitHub or GitLab. The free open source edition has unlimited executions and deploys on Fargate, Docker or Kubernetes. Enterprise starts at $120 a month, with seats at $20 per builder and compute units for workers on top. The free edition caps workspaces at 3 and lacks audit logs, and seat-plus-compute pricing takes some modeling before you commit.
What it does well
- +Free edition has unlimited executions
- +Covers scripts, workflows and internal apps in one place
- +Deploys on Fargate, Docker or Kubernetes in minutes
Where it falls short
- −Free edition limits workspaces to 3 and lacks audit logs
- −Pricing combines builder seats and compute units, which takes some modeling
- −Git sync on the free edition is limited to 2 users
- Free edition
- Unlimited executions, 3 workspaces
- Enterprise
- From $120 a month
- Builder seat
- $20 a month per builder
- Compliance
- SOC 2 Type II
No. 9
AWS Step FunctionsA serverless AWS service that orchestrates AWS services and APIs as visual state machine workflows.
8.1of 10Best for Teams already on AWS that want to coordinate Lambda functions and other AWS services without running an orchestrator.
- Capabilities
- 8.2
- Ease of setup
- 7.4
- Value
- 8.5
Price
Standard Workflows $0.000025 per state transition in US East with 4,000 free a month; Express Workflows billed per request and duration
Quoted from the AWS Step Functions pricing page on November 9, 2026:
The price per state transition in US East (N. Virginia) is $0.000025 and the Free Tier provides 4,000 state transitions per month.
AWS Step Functions ranks ninth because it is the obvious choice for one audience and a weaker one for everyone else. If your work already lives on AWS, it connects directly to 220 AWS services and over 10,000 APIs, so you can chain Lambda functions, queues and machine learning jobs into a workflow without hosting an orchestrator. Standard Workflows bill per state transition, $0.000025 in US East with 4,000 free each month, and you pay nothing for idle time while a state waits, up to one year. Express Workflows handle event rates above 100,000 per second and bill per request and duration, $1.00 per million requests plus memory time. Large parallel jobs over images, logs or CSV files are built in. The downsides are lock-in to AWS, retries that add billable transitions, and workflows defined as state machines rather than ordinary application code.
What it does well
- +Fully managed, with nothing to host or upgrade
- +No charge for idle time while a state waits
- +Deepest native integration with AWS services
Where it falls short
- −Workflows are tied to AWS
- −Retries can add billable state transitions
- −Workflows are defined as state machines rather than ordinary application code
- Standard Workflows
- $0.000025 per state transition in US East
- Free tier
- 4,000 state transitions a month
- Express requests
- $1.00 per million
- Max wait
- Up to one year per state
Visit aws.amazon.com|Read the full AWS Step Functions profile
No. 10
AstronomerAstro, a managed orchestration platform for Apache Airflow with an AI data engineering agent, auto-scaling workers and observability.
7.9of 10Best for Data teams that already run Apache Airflow DAGs and want a managed service with scale-to-zero workers and lineage.
- Capabilities
- 8.6
- Ease of setup
- 7.5
- Value
- 7.4
Price
Usage-based; Developer deployments from $0.35 an hour, Team from $0.42 an hour, workers from $0.13 an hour
Quoted from the Astronomer pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Deployments starting at $0.35/hr.
Astronomer rounds out the list as the managed home for Apache Airflow. Astro runs the scheduler, webserver and triggerer for each deployment, and its workers scale to zero when idle, so teams with existing DAGs can drop the work of operating Airflow themselves. The development side includes a browser-based Astro IDE with AI-generated Airflow code, the Astro CLI for local testing and a Terraform provider. Otto, its data engineering agent, can author DAGs, review pull requests and investigate production failures using task logs and run history. Observability covers lineage, SLA monitoring and alerting, and the dbt integration turns dbt projects into DAGs. Pricing is usage-based: Developer deployments start at $0.35 an hour, Team at $0.42 an hour and workers at $0.13 an hour, with dedicated clusters from $2.40 an hour. It ranks last for this audience because hourly deployment billing adds up and Airflow suits scheduled data pipelines better than application jobs or agent loops.
What it does well
- +Runs existing Airflow DAGs without managing infrastructure
- +Hibernating deployments and scale-to-zero workers cut idle cost
- +Available through AWS, Azure and GCP marketplaces
Where it falls short
- −Hourly deployment pricing makes monthly cost harder to predict
- −Built around Airflow, which suits scheduled data pipelines more than app jobs
- −Higher tiers such as Business and Enterprise need a quote
- Developer
- Deployments from $0.35 an hour
- Team
- Deployments from $0.42 an hour
- Workers
- From $0.13 an hour
- Dedicated clusters
- From $2.40 an hour
Before you pick a product or a plan
Pick the model that fits the work
Durable execution engines such as Temporal, Inngest, Trigger.dev, Hatchet and Restate wrap application code so each step is checkpointed and retried, which suits background jobs, payments and agent loops. Data orchestrators such as Prefect, Dagster and Astronomer schedule pipelines, track runs and show lineage across data tools. AWS Step Functions models workflows as state machines that call AWS services. Choose the model first, then the vendor.
Start from your language
Temporal publishes SDKs for Go, Java, Python, TypeScript, .NET, Ruby and PHP, and Restate covers TypeScript, Python, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust and Ruby. Hatchet supports TypeScript, Python and Go, and Inngest maintains TypeScript, Python, Go and Kotlin SDKs. Trigger.dev is built for TypeScript and can run Python, while Prefect is Python first. Windmill runs scripts in TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust, Bash, SQL and more.
Understand the billing unit
Each vendor meters something different. Temporal bills per action, Hatchet per task run, Restate per action within a monthly plan, Inngest per execution within a plan, Trigger.dev per second of compute plus a run fee, Dagster per credit, Astronomer per deployment and worker hour, and AWS Step Functions per state transition. Estimate how many steps one workflow run creates before you compare headline prices.
Decide between cloud and self-hosting
Temporal, Hatchet, Restate, Prefect, Trigger.dev and Windmill all document a self-hosted open source option, so you can run the engine on your own servers and pay only for infrastructure. Managed cloud removes upgrades and on-call work for the orchestrator itself. Many teams develop locally against the open source server and move to the vendor cloud for production.
Check limits on run length and concurrency
Long agent loops and human approvals need workflows that can wait. Inngest caps a run at 30 days on Free, 90 days on Pro and 366 days on Business, while AWS Step Functions Standard Workflows can wait up to one year. Concurrency also differs: Trigger.dev Free allows 20 concurrent runs and Pro 200, and Inngest Free allows 5 concurrent steps.
Questions readers ask
- What is the best workflow orchestration tool in 2026?
- Temporal ranks first for durable, long-running workflows in code, with SDKs in seven languages and a cloud from $50 per million actions with no base fee. Inngest and Trigger.dev are quicker to start for TypeScript teams, and Prefect leads for Python data pipelines.
- Which workflow orchestration tool has the best free tier?
- Hatchet Cloud includes 1M task runs and 1M events free every month. Inngest's Free plan includes 50k executions, Restate Cloud's Free plan includes 100k actions, and Windmill's open source edition has unlimited executions when you self-host it.
- What is the cheapest paid workflow orchestration plan?
- Trigger.dev Hobby costs $10 a month and includes $10 of compute credits, and Dagster Solo costs $10 a month plus credits. Usage-based options such as Hatchet at $30 per million runs and AWS Step Functions at $0.000025 per state transition can cost less at low volume.
- What is durable execution?
- Durable execution means the orchestrator records the state of your code after each step, so after a crash, timeout or deploy the run resumes where it stopped instead of starting over. Temporal, Inngest, Trigger.dev, Hatchet and Restate are all built around this model.
- Which tools work best for AI agent loops?
- Trigger.dev offers durable chat agents with human approval for tool calls, Inngest adds agent evals and sandboxes, and Temporal and Restate document agent patterns such as human-in-the-loop and resumable steps. All of them keep agent progress across crashes and redeploys.
- Can I self-host these tools?
- Yes for most. Temporal, Hatchet, Restate, Trigger.dev, Prefect and Windmill all document open source, self-hostable versions. AWS Step Functions and Astronomer are managed services.
Spotted an error or a price change? Write to editorial@dbotmaker.io
Nobody paid to appear here and none of the links earn us money. Details are in our editorial policy. Makers change prices, plans and terms often, so check the price on their site before you buy or upgrade.